|Skip Links | Access/General | Site Map|
|Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences
|You are here: Home >|
Subscribe to News and Events
Objecting to Conscience: Reconsidering section 4 of the Abortion Act 1967
Date: 26 March 2014 Time: 4.00pm - 5.00pm
Venue: Bowland North Seminar Room 22
In a recent paper Professor Michael Thomson explored the role of the medical profession's boundary-work in shaping English abortion law. Mapping nineteenth- and twentieth-century medical campaigns to change the law regulating abortion, he argued that such campaigns were motivated - in part - by the desire for occupational closure and advancement. As elsewhere, this 'professionalisation project' relied upon claims to special knowledge and ethicality that were not necessarily evidenced in practice. In this paper, and in response to Doogan and Wood v Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health Board  CSIH 36, he revisits this framework to analyse the Abortion Act 1967 and particularly section 4, the conscientious objection provision relied upon in the case.
Addressing the Act as a whole, he argues that it was significantly shaped by a successful campaign designed to save the profession from encroachment on its professional jurisdiction by both patients and the legislature. More specifically, in responding to Doogan and Wood, he argues that we should be mindful of the fact that Section 4 provided a key means whereby the profession avoided routinization, maintained and promoted the notion of its ethical practice, and helped to extend the medical profession's (politically useful) narrative of abortion as morally ambiguous.
Who can attend: Anyone
|| Home | Departments | People | Study Here | Research | Business and Enterprise | News and Events |
- FASS Intranet -