Volume 6 (2) 2013

STRATEGIES USED BY THE FAR RIGHT TO COUNTER ACCUSATIONS OF RACISM  Pages 97-113

Simon Goodman and Andrew Johnson

Download Full Text

  • This paper addresses the way in which the leader of the far-right British National Party (BNP), Nick Griffin, attempts to present the party as non-racist during hostile media appearances. The process of ‘fascism recalibration’, in which the party attempts to present itself in a more moderate way, which has been used to account for its electoral gain, is discussed. A discursive analytical approach is applied to one television and two radio programmes, all on the BBC, in which Nick Griffin was interviewed. The paper addresses the question: ‘how is the BNP presented in a way that makes it appear reasonable and achieve ‘fascism recalibration’? Analysis identified three strategies employed for this objective. These are: the party is presented as (1) acting as a moderating force, whereby a favourable distinction is made between the BNP and both other extremists and the BNP’s own past; (2) acting in minority groups’ best interests, where BNP policies are presented as being both supported by, and aimed to aid, minority groups; and (3) only opposing minority groups because of their own prejudices, a strategy used to justify Islamaphobia based on the supposed intolerances of Islam. The implications and limitations of these strategies are discussed.
    1. Allen, C. (2010). Islamophobia. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
    2. Allen, C. (2011). Opposing Islamification or promoting Islamophobia? Understanding the English Defence League. Patterns of Prejudice 45 (4): 325-340.
    3. Atton C. (2006). Far-right media on the internet: Culture, discourse and power. New Media Society 8(4): 573-587.
    4. Augoustinos, M. and D. Every (2007). The language of ‘‘race” and prejudice: A discourse of denial, reason, and liberal-practical politics. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 26: 123-141.
    5. Augoustinos, M., K. Tuffin and D. Every (2005).  New racism, meritocracy and Individualism: Constraining affirmative Action in education. Discourse & Society 16 (3): 315-340.
    6. Billig, M. (1978). Fascists: A Social Psychological View of the National Front. London: Academic Press.
    7. Billig, M. (1988). The notion of ‘prejudice': Some rhetorical and ideological aspects. Text 8 (1-2): 91-110.
    8. Billig, M. (2001). Humour and hatred: The racist jokes of the Ku Klux Klan. Discourse & Society 12 (3): 267-289.
    9. Copsey, N. (2004). Contemporary British Fascism: The British National Party and the Quest for Legitimacy. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
    10. Copsey, N. (2007). Changing course or changing clothes? Reflections on the ideological evolution of the British National Party 1996-2006. Patterns of Prejudice 41 (1): 61-82.
    11. Edwards, G.O. (2012) A comparative discourse analysis of the construction of ‘in-groups’ in the 2005 and 2010 manifestos of the British National Party. Discourse & Society23 (3): 245-258.
    12. Edwards, D. and A. Fasulo (2006). ‘To Be Honest': Sequential uses of honesty phrases in talk-in-interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 39 (4): 343-376.
    13. Edwards, D. and J. Potter (1992).  Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.
    14. Ford, R. and M. Goodwin (2010). Angry White Men: Individual and contextual predictors of support for the British National Party. Political Studies 58: 1-25.
    15. Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.
    16. Goodman, S. (2008) Justifying the harsh treatment of asylum seekers on the grounds of social cohesion. Annual Review of Critical Psychology 6: 110-124
    17. Halikiopoulou, D. and S. Vasilopoulou (2010). Towards a ‘civic’ narrative: British national identity and the transformation of the British National Party. The Political Quarterly81 (4): 584-592.
    18. Johnson, A. and S. Goodman (2013).  Reversing racism and the elite conspiracy: Strategies used by British national party leader in response to hostile media. Discourse, Context & Media, 2: 156-164 
    19. Potter, J. and M. Wetherell (1987). Discourse and Social Psychology, Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage.
    20. Rhodes, J. (2009). The political breakthrough of the BNP: The case of Burnley. British Politics 4 (1): 22-46.
    21. Rhodes, J. (2011). ‘It’s not just them, it’s whites as well': Whiteness, class and BNP support. Sociology 45 (1): 102-117.
    22. Richardson, J.E. (2011).  Race and racial difference: The surface and depth of BNP ideology. In N. Copsey and G. Macklin (eds.), British National Party: Contemporary Perspectives. London: Routledge. pp.38-61.
    23. Rooyackers I.N. and M. Verkuyten (2012). Mobilizing support for the extreme right: A discursive analysis of minority leadership. British Journal of Social Psychology 51: 130-148.
    24. Van der Valk, I. (2003) Right-Wing parliamentary discourse on immigration in France. Discourse & Society 14 (3): 309-348.
    25. van Dijk, T.A. (1993) Denying racism: Elite discourse and racism. In J. Solomos and J. Wrench (eds.), Racism and Migration in Western Europe. Oxford: Berg. pp.179-193.
    26. Verkuyten, M. (2011). Justifying discrimination against Muslim immigrants: Out-group ideology and the five-social identity model. British Journal of Social Psychology. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02081.x
    27. Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society 9 (3): 387-412.
    28. Wetherell, M. and J. Potter (1992). Mapping the Language of Racism. London: Harvest Wheatsheaf.
    29. Wood, C. and W.M.L. Finlay (2008). British National Party representations of Muslims in the month after the London bombings: Homogeneity, threat, and the conspiracy tradition. British Journal of Social Psychology 47: 707-726.
    30. Woodbridge, S. (2010). Christian credentials? The role of religion in British National Party ideology. Journal for the Study of Radicalism 4 (1): 25-54.

THE CORPORATION AS PERSON AND PSYCHOPATH: MULTIMODAL METAPHOR, RHETORIC AND RESISTANCE  Pages 114-136

Arran Stibbe

Download Full Text

  • This article conducts a detailed analysis of multimodal metaphor in the documentary film The Corporation, with particular focus on the metaphor the corporation is a person. The metaphors that make up the film are analysed within the immediate context of the rhetorical structure of the film, the discursive context of the use of the corporation is a person metaphor by corporations to gain power, and the background context of the corporation is a person as a ubiquitous conceptual metaphor in everyday cognition. The metaphors in the film are then compared with other multimodal metaphors from two protest videos. The article can be thought of as Positive Discourse Analysis, in that the use of metaphors in the film and videos is held up as an example of how multimodal media can be used to resist hegemonic discourses that harm people and the environment. A practical aim of the analysis is to reveal the detailed workings of the metaphors in order to provide resources that can be drawn on in the construction of effective materials for challenging hegemonic constructions of the corporation in the future.
    1. Adbusters (2012) Adbusters Spoof Advertisements. Available from www.adbusters.org/spoofads/tobacco.
    2. Bakan, J. (2005).  The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power. DVD. London: Free Press.
    3. Bakan, J. (2012). Joel Bakan: Writer, Co-creator, Associate Producer. Available from www.thecorporation.com/index.cfm?page_id=23.
    4. Barnett, M. (2004). Kicking the black box around: A review of ‘the corporation’. Organisational Analysis 12 (4): 419-422.
    5. Batts, W. and A. Madansky (2008).  The Corporation, a movie produced by Mark Achbar. Academy of Management Learning & Education 7: 592-594.
    6. BNC (2012). British National Corpus. Available from www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/corpus/index.xml
    7. Boxoffice (2012). Box office mojo. Available from http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=corporationus.htm.
    8. Brown, D. (2001).  Street crime, corporate crime, and the contingency of criminal liability. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 149: 1295-1360
    9. Coëgnarts, M. and P. Kravanja (2012).  From thought to modality: A theoretical framework for analysing structural-conceptual metaphors and image metaphors in film.Image and Narrative 13:1:96
    10. Congress (2006). United States Code 2006 by Congress and House Office of the Law Revision. US Government Printing Office. 
    11. Fairclough, N. (1992).  Discourse and Social Change. London: Polity Press.
    12. Fairclough, N. (2001).  Language and Power. London: Longman.
    13. Fairclough, N. (2003). ‘Political Correctness': The politics of culture and language. Discourse & Society 14 (1): 17-28.
    14. Forceville, C. (1996). Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising. London: Routledge.
    15. Forceville, C. (2002). The identification of target and source in pictorial metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1-14.
    16. Forceville, C. (2007) Multimodal metaphor in ten Dutch TV commercials. The Public Journal of semiotics 1 (1): 15-34.
    17. Forceville, C. (2009) Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework. In C. Forceville and E. Urios-Aparisi (eds.), Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.  pp 4-19.
    18. French, P. (1979). The Corporation as a Moral Person. American Philosophical Quarterly 16: 207-215.
    19. Geis, G. (1998). Fox on corporate personhood, limited liability, and community control: A critique. Behavioural Sciences and the Law 16: 265-272.
    20. Gibson, K. (2011).  Toward an intermediate position on corporate moral personhood. Journal of Business Ethics 101: 71-81.
    21. Halliday, M. (2004).  An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Hodder Education.
    22. Johnson, M. (1983).  Metaphorical Reasoning. Southern Journal of Philosophy 21 (3): 371-389.
    23. Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Reason and Imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    24. Johnson, M. (1993). Moral Imagination: Implications of Cognitive Science for Ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    25. Katz, R. (2010). The corporate crimes of Dow Chemical and the failure to regulate environmental pollution. Critical Criminology 18: 295-306.
    26. Kerlin, M. (1997) Peter French, corporate ethics and the wizard of Oz. Journal of Business Ethics 16 (12/13:): 1431-1438.
    27. Kollor, V. (2009). Brand images: Multimodal metaphor in corporate branding messages. In C. Forceville and E. Urios-Aparisi (eds.), Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.  pp. 45-72.
    28. Kövecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    29. Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    30. Kramer, R., R. Michalowski and D. Kauzlarich (2002). The origins and develop of the concept and theory of state-corporate crime. Crime and Delinquency 48: 263-282
    31. Kyratzis, S. (2003). Laughing metaphorically: Metaphor and humour in discourse. Paper presented at the 8th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference.
    32. Lakoff, G. (1987) Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about The Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    33. Lakoff, G. (1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  pp. 202-251.
    34. Lakoff, G. (2002) Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    35. Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson (1980). Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    36. Lakoff, G. and E. Wehling (2012).  The power to make metaphor into law. RSN. available from http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/272-39/12092-focus-the-power-to-make-metaphor-into-law.
    37. Lakoff, G. and M. Turner (1989).  More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    38. Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
    39. Linthicum, K. (2011).  L.A. calls for end to ‘corporate personhood. LA Times Dec 6 available from http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2011/12/corporate-personhood-la-constitutional-amendment.html
    40. Maes, A. and J. Schilperoord (2008).  Classifying visual rhetoric: Conceptual and structural heuristics in interpreting and classifying visual rhetoric. In B. Phillips and E. McQuarrie (eds.), Go Figure: New Directions in Advertising Rhetoric. New York: Sharpe.  pp. 227-253.
    41. Manning, R. (1984).  Corporate responsibility and corporate personhood. Journal of Business Ethics 3 (1): 77-84.
    42. Martin, J. (2006). Positive discourse analysis: Power, solidarity and change. Journal of English Studies 4 (14): 21-35.
    43. Muller, C. (2008). Metaphors Dead and Alive, Sleeping and Waking: A Dynamic View. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    44. NYCC (2012). Opposing the US Supreme court’s interpretation of the constitution in Citizens United. http://legistar.council.nyc.gov/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=1020081&GUID=7B877E8C-4823-4AC3-B283-406534448686.
    45. Occupy (2012). Resolution to end corporate personhood. Occupy Wall Street available from http://www.nycga.net/2012/01/01/11-resolution-to-end-corporate-personhood/.
    46. Ortiz, M. (2010). Visual rhetoric: primary metaphors and symmetric object alignment. Metaphor & Symbol 25: 162-180.
    47. Pedro, J. (2011). The Propaganda Model in the Early 21st Century. International Journal of Communication 5: 1865-1905.
    48. Pfeiffer, R. (1990). The central distinction in the theory of corporate moral personhood. Journal of Business Ethics 9: 473-480.
    49. Phillips, B. and E. McQuarrie (2004). Beyond visual metaphor: A new typology of visual rhetoric in advertising. Marketing Theory 4 (1/2): 113-136.
    50. Phillips, M. (1992). Corporate moral personhood and three conceptions of the corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly 2 (4): 435-459.
    51. Rushe, D. (2012). HSBC ‘sorry’ for aiding Mexican drugs lords, rogue states and terrorists. The Guardian, 17 July.
    52. Schilperoord, J., A. Maes and H. Ferdinandusse (2009). Perceptual and conceptual visual rhetoric: The case of symmetric object alignment. Metaphor & Symbol 24: 155-173.
    53. Stibbe, A. (1997). Metaphor: From a static to a dynamic account. South African Journal of Linguistics 15 (3): 6-12.
    54. Stibbe, A. (1998). The power of visual metaphor. Studies in Language and Culture  24: 87-108.
    55. Stockwell, P. (2000). Towards a critical cognitive linguistics? In A. Combrink and I. Biermann (eds.), Discourses of War and Conflict. Potchefstroom: Potchefstroom University Press. pp.510-28.
    56. Taylor, H. (2011). (I’ll Believe) “Corporations Are People” (When Texas Executes One). www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMdR4Z6u3ms.
    57. Taylor, H. (2012). I’ll believe corporations are persons when Texas executes one. www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMdR4Z6u3ms.
    58. Teng, N. and S. Sun (2002). Grouping, simile and oxymoron in pictures: A design-based cognitive approach. Metaphor & Symbol 17 (4): 295-316.
    59. van Dijk (2012). Society and Discourse: How Social Contexts Influence Text and Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    60. West, D. and J. West (2004). The Life and Times of the Corporation: An Interview with Jennifer Abbott. Cineaste winter.
    61. Wilson, D. and D. Sperber (1993). Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua 90: 1-25.
    62. Witt, J (2011). What is the basis for corporate personhood? NPR http://www.npr.org/2011/10/24/141663195/what-is-the-basis-for-corporate-personhood.
    63. WorldLeaderP (2010). “Corporations Aren’t People” — Corporate Personhood Protest www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDDPnS2sNfM&list=FLcQARDZ-DWTS-8mKKQH3gJA.
    64. Yeager, P. (2009). Science, values and politics: An insider’s reflections on corporate crime research. Crime Law Social Change 51: 5-30.

MONSTERS AND ADDICTS: A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF SHARK REPRESENTATIONS IN DISNEY’S SCRIPTED MARINE ENVIRONMENT  Pages 137-153

Brian Rugen

Download Full Text

  • This article analyzes the representation of the shark in two popular Disney animated films. I draw on social semiotics as an analytical framework, focusing on the structural aspects of film while considering how meaning is communicated through representations of the world (representation), interactions with viewers (orientation), and the structuring of texts as a whole (organization). Data include three instances from the films where sharks appear or in which other characters make reference to them: one scene from The Little Mermaid; one scene from Finding Nemo; and an extended sequence, also from Finding Nemo. The analysis uncovers the ways in which structural elements such as camera, lighting, sound and rhythm, within recognizable patterns of micro-narratives, contribute significantly to the discursive construction of shark as monster and shark as addict.
    1. Bordwell, D. and K. Thompson (2008). Film Art. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    2. Brown, B. (2009). Fearing the addict: Hollywood’s projection of America’s phobia of drug addicts. In L. Franklin and R. Richardson (eds.), The Many Forms of Fear, Horror, and Terror. Oxford: Inter-Disciplinary Press. pp. 175-186.
    3. Brown, D. and R.D. Zanuck (Producers) and S. Spielberg (Director). (1975). Jaws [Motion picture]. United States: Universal Pictures.
    4. Brown, D. and R.D. Zanuck (Producers) and J. Szwarc (Director). (1978). Jaws 2 [Motion picture]. United States: Universal Pictures.
    5. Cape, G.S. (2003). Addiction, stigma, and movies. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 107 (3): 163-169.
    6. Carroll, N. (1990). The Philosophy of Horror or Paradoxes of the Heart. New York, NY: Routledge.
    7. Clements, R., J. Muskar and H. Ashman (Producers) and Clements, R. and J. Muskar (Directors). (1989). The Little Mermaid [Motion picture]. United States: Walt Disney Pictures.
    8. Dulvy, N.K., J.K. Baum, S. Clarke, L.J.V. Compagno, E. Cortés, A. Domingo and S. Fordham (2008). You can swim but you can’t hide: The global status and conservation of oceanic pelagic sharks and rays. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 18 (5): 459-482.
    9. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    10. Feng Sun, C. and E. Scharrer (2004). Staying true to Disney: College students’ resistance to criticism of The Little Mermaid. The Communication Review 7: 35-55.
    11. Forceville, C. (2009). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphors in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In C. Forceville and E. Urios-Aparisi (eds.), Multimodal Metaphor.  Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.  pp. 19-425.
    12. Giroux, H. (n.d.). Disney, Southern Baptists, and children’s culture: The magic kingdom as Sodom and Gomorrah? Retrieved December 29, 2009, from
      http://www.henryagiroux.com/online_articles/southern_baptists.htm
    13. Goatly, A. (2002). Representation of nature in the BBC World Service. Text 22 (1): 1-27.
    14. Goldsman, A., R. Kosberg, T. Ludwig and A. Riche (Producers) and Harlin, R. (Director). (1999). Deep Blue Sea [Motion Picture]. United States: Warner Bros.
    15. Halliday, M.A.K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
    16. Hitzig, R. (Producer) and Alves, J. (Director). (1983). Jaws 3 [Motion picture]. United States: Universal Pictures.
    17. Huggins, R. (2010). Images of Addiction: The representation of illicit drug use in popular media. In L. Moore and M. Kosut (eds.), The Body Reader: Essential and Cultural Readings. New York: New York University Press. pp. 384-398.
    18. Humane Society (2012). Sharks. Retrieved from http://www.humanesociety.org/animals/sharks/.
    19. Iedema, R. (2001). Analysing film and television: A social semiotic account of hospital: An unhealthy business. In T. van. Leeuwen and C. Jewitt (eds.), Handbook of Visual Analysis. London: Sage. pp. 183-204.
    20. Jewitt, C. and R. Oyama (2001). Visual meaning: A social semiotic approach. In T. van Leeuwen and C. Jewitt (eds.), Handbook of Visual Analysis. London: Sage. pp. 134-156.
    21. Kress, G. and T. van Leeuwen (2006). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
    22. Larkin, M.J. and M. Engel (Producers) and Feigelson, J.D. (Director). (2003). Red Water [Motion Picture]. United States: Sony Pictures Television.
    23. Lau, L. and E. Lau (Producers) and Kentis, C. (Director). (2004). Open Water [Motion picture]. United States: Lions Gate Entertainment.
    24. Maag, D. and P. Schultz-Deyle (Producers) and Horn, H. (Director). (2006). Open Water 2: Adrift [Motion picture]. Germany: Summit Entertainment.
    25. Misiorowski, B. (Director). (1999). Shark Attack [Motion Picture]. United States: Martien Holdings, A.V.V.
    26. Montoro, E.L. and U. Tucci (Producers) and Castellari, E.G. (Director). (1982). Great White [Motion Picture]. United States: Film Ventures International.
    27. Myers, R.A., J.K. Baum, T.D. Shepherd, S.P. Powers and C.H. Peterson (2007). Cascading effects of the loss of apex predatory sharks from a coastal ocean. Science 315: 1846-1850.
    28. Nelson, V. (2006, February 13). Peter Benchley, 65; ‘Jaws’ author became shark conservationist. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://articles.latimes.com/2006/feb/13/local/me-benchley13
    29. Sargent, J. (Producer/Director). (1987). Jaws: The Revenge [Motion picture]. United States: Universal Pictures.
    30. Stewart, R. (Producer/Director). (2007). Sharkwater [Motion picture]. Canada: Freestyle Releasing.
    31. Stibbe, A. (2001). Language, power and the social construction of animals. Society & Animals 9 (2): 145-161.
    32. Stibbe, A. (2003). As charming as a pig: The discursive construction of the relationship between pigs and humans. Society & Animals 11 (4): 375-392.
    33. Stibbe, A. (2006). Deep ecology and language: The curtailed journey of the Atlantic Salmon. Society & Animals 14 (1): 61-77.
    34. van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Tannen, D. Schiffrin and H. Hamilton (eds.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell. pp. 352-371.
    35. van Leeuwen, T. (1985). Rhythmic structure of the film text. In T.A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse and Communication: New Approaches to the Analysis of Mass Media Discourse and Communication. New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter. pp. 216-232.
    36. van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Moving English: The visual language of film. In S. Goodman and D. Graddol (eds.), Redesigning English: New Texts, New Identities. London: Routledge. pp. 81-105.
    37. Walters, G., J. Lasseter and J. Gotoh (Producers) and Stanton, A. and L. Unkrich (Directors). (2003). Finding Nemo [Motion picture]. United States: Walt Disney Pictures.
    38. Ward, P. and R.A. Myers (2005). Shifts in open-ocean fish communities coinciding with the commencement of commercial fishing. Ecology 86: 835-847.
    39. Whitley, D. (2008). The Idea of Nature in Disney Animation. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
    40. Wood, R. (2003). Hollywood from Vietnam to Reagan…and beyond. New York: Columbia University Press.

WHY DO BRAINS DRAIN? BRAIN DRAIN IN IRAN’S POLITICAL DISCOURSE  Pages 154-173

Neda Karimi and Sepideh Gharaati

Download Full Text

  • This article examines and compares the discursive representation of Iran’s brain drain in the political discourse of Iranian authorities during the time of Mohammad Khatami and Mahmud Ahmadinejad, two Iranian presidents with different political orientations. The aim is to uncover the global political goals of the speakers. Lee’s (1966) model of migration is used to define and outline the factors and groups that are involved in the process of brain drain and van Leeuwen’s (2008) sociosematic framework for the representation of social actors is applied to examine how different actors are represented in different discourses. During the first period reformists ascribed brain drain to political and managerial issues caused by the Islamic principalists. The main actors in their discourse about brain drain were the opposition and the migrants and brain drain was pictured as a product of the pressures and limitations imposed by the Islamic principalists on the university students and the educated class. With this representation reformists seemed to try to win the support of the youth while keeping themselves in a secured zone. In the second period Mahmud Ahmadinejad denied brain drain. The Islamic fundamentalists attributed the phenomenon to the migrants’ lack of religious faith and the government ascribed it to their lack of national attachment. Politicians and authorities as a social actor group were almost absent in the governments’ remarks. Such definition and representation of brain drain by Islamic principalists and fundamentalists seemed to follow the objective of legitimizing government’s actions and policies in front of their supporters.
    1. Bazzi, S. (2009). Arab News and Conflict: A Multi-Disciplinary Discourse Study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    2. Bernstein, B. (1990). The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. London: Routledge.
    3. Chilton, P.A. (2004). Analyzing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
    4. Fallahi, K. and A. Monavaryan (2008). A study on the factors of elites (human capital) immigration and suggesting appropriate strategies to prevent this phenomenon.Journal of Science and Development 24: 107-136 (in Persian).
    5. Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.
    6. Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
    7. Hajiyousefi A.M. and S. Behmard (2006). The causes of Iran’s Elite migration after the End of the Imposed War. Political Science Bulletin 4: 27-67 (in Persian).
    8. Halliday, M.A.K. & C.M.I.M. Matthiessen (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
    9. Lee, E.S. (1966). A Theory of Migration.  Demography 3 (1): 47-57.
    10. Sadeghi GhotbAbadi, N. (2007). Surveying Brain Drain Reasons among Sharif University of Technology Students. (Unpublished Thesis). Tehran: Tarbiat Moallem University (in Persian).
    11. Salehi Omran, E. (2006). The analysis of the attitudes of faculty members towards the causes of elite migration. Social Science Letter 28: 56-80 (in Persian).
    12. van Dijk, T.A. ([1992] 2008). Discourse and the denial of racism.  Discourse & Society 3 (1): 87-118.  Reprinted in T.A. van Dijk (2008).  Discourse and Power. London: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 120-154.
    13. van Dijk, T.A. (1997). What is Political Discourse Analysis? In J. Blommaert and C. Bulcaen (eds.), Political Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 11-52.
    14. van Dijk, T.A. (2005). War rhetoric of a little ally: Political implicatures of Anzari’s legitimization of the war in Iraq. Journal of Language and Politics 4 (1): 65-92.
    15. van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

STRATEGIC USE OF METAPHOR IN NIGERIAN NEWSPAPER REPORTS: A CRITICAL PERSPECTIVE  Pages 174-192

Chinwe Roseann Ezeifeka

Download Full Text

  • Metaphor, a pervasive cognitive phenomenon for encoding social meanings and cultural presuppositions has been implicated as a strategic linguistic tool for the media in swaying public perceptions and assuming consensus for the argument they want to project as the ‘truth’. Using insights from critical discourse analysis, conceptual metaphor theory and critical metaphor analysis, this paper appraises the array of conventional metaphors used by a privately-owned Nigerian newspaper, the Guardian, to report the Nigerian Union of Teachers’ strike. Our findings revealed the newspaper’s apparently inadvertent ideological solidarity with the power elite, hidden under the mask of metaphors in its attempt to act out its watchdog role in the teachers’ case. The study puts this ambivalence down to either a deliberate strategic recourse to formulate new as well as exploit pre-existing conceptual frames as repressive apparatus against the NUT demand for a special salary structure or to lack of awareness of the negative effects of these metaphors. The paper calls these metaphors up for scrutiny and reconceptualization in terms of creating awareness to the Nigerian reading public, the political elite, the teachers and the newspaper on the pervasiveness and negative effects of such subtle metaphors in media reporting.
    1. Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Fafunwa, A.B. (1974). History of Education in Nigeria. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.
    3. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language.  Essex:  Longman: Group Ltd.
    4. Fairclough, N. (2002). Critical linguistics/critical discourse analysis. In K. Malmkjaer (ed.), The Linguistic Encyclopedia (2nd edn.). London: Routledge, pp.102-106.
    5. Fairclough, N. (1999). Global capitalism and critical awareness of language. Language Awareness.8(2). Available at: http://www.multilingual-matters.net/1a/008/0071/la008007/1pdf. (accessed July 30 2008).
    6. Federal Republic of Nigeria (1999). The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999. Abuja: National Educational Research and Development Council (NERDC).
    7. Federal Republic of Nigeria (2004). National policy on education (4th edn.). Abuja: National Educational Research and Development Council (NERDC).
    8. Fitch, K.L. and R.E. Sanders (eds.) (2005).  A Handbook of Language and Social Interaction.  New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
    9. Hart, C and D. Lukeš (eds) (2007). Cognitive Linguistics in Critical Discourse Analysis: Application and Theory. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    10. Johnson, E.J. (2007).  Sculpting public opinion: Understanding the (mis)use of metaphor in the media. In C. Hart and D. Lukeš (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics in Critical Discourse Analysis: Application and Theory. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. pp.28-56.
    11. Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (ed), Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp.202-251
    12. Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    13. Mazrui, A.A. (1998). Black metaphor and the English semantics. In A.A. Mazrui and A.M. Mazrui (eds.), The Power of Babel: Language & Governance in the African Experience. Oxford: James Currey Ltd. pp.25-29.
    14. Mey, J.L. (2001).  Pragmatics: An Introduction. Malden:  Blackwell.
    15. Musolff, A. (2007). Is there such a thing as discourse history? The case of metaphor. In C. Hart and D. Lukeš (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics in Critical Discourse Analysis: Application and Theory. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.  pp.1-27.
    16. O’Halloran, K. (2007). Casualness vs. commitment: The use in critical discourse analysis of Lakoff and Johnson’s approach to metaphor. In C. Hart and D. Lukeš (eds.),Cognitive Linguistics in Critical Discourse Analysis: Application and Theory. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. pp.159-179.
    17. Oloyede, B. (1990) Free Press and Society: Dismantling the Culture of Silence. Ibadan: Stirling-Horden Publishers Ltd.
    18. Robinson, M. (ed.) (2007). Chambers 21st Century Dictionary. (Revised ed) New Delhi: Allied Chambers Ltd.
    19. Thornborrow, J. (2000). Language and the media.  In L. Thomas and S. Wareing (eds.), Language, Society and Power: An Introduction. London: Routledge, pp.49-64.
    20. Trail, V.G. (2004). Rhetorical Terms and Concepts: A Contemporary Glossary. Ibadan: Spectrum Books Ltd.
    21. van Dijk, T.A. (1993) Elite Discourse and Racism. London: Sage.
    22. van Dijk, T.A. (2005) Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity. In R. Wodak and M. Meyer (eds.),  Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.  pp.95-120.
    23. Wareing, S. (2000) What is language and what does it do?  In L. Thomas and S. Wareing (eds.), Language, Society and Power: An Introduction. London: Routledge.  pp.1-15.
    24. Watson, J. and A. Hill (2006). Dictionary of Media and Communication Studies (7th edn.). London: Hodder Arnold.
    25. Wodak, R. (2005) What CDA is about? In R. Wodak and M. Meyer (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.  pp.1-13.
    26. Wodak, R. and B. Busch (2004). Approaches to media texts. In J. Downing et al. (eds.), Handbook of Media Studies. London: Sage. Available at: http://www.cis.or.at/download/approaches.pdf.  (accessed July 30 2008)

    Newspaper Articles

    1. Abubakar, M. (2008). Retreat reveals background of teacher’s salary structure. The Guardian, 3 July: 60.
    2. Abubakar, M. and Awoyale, F. (2008). Govt. maintains stance, teachers begin strike today. The Guardian, 30 June: 1.
    3. Abuh, A. (2008). Private school owners decry harassment by NUT’ The Guardian, 1 July: 9.
    4. Adisa, B. (2008). Teachers are marching on. The Guardian, 2 July: 67
    5. Akhaine, S. (2008). Teachers protest in Kaduna, ask government to meet demands. The Guardian, 28 July: 8.
    6. Akparanta, M., U. Atueyi and E. Anuforo (2008). Schools remain closed as teachers’ strike bites harder. The Guardian, 3 July: 57
    7. Ozioruva, A.O., C. Collins, I. Nejuvie, F. Ugwuoke and I. Ayandare (2008). When teachers insist on their rewards on earth… The Guardian, 18 July: 30-31.
    8. Fagbemi, A. (2008). Governors to wade into teachers’ strike. The Guardian, 23 July: 6
    9. Ijediogor, G., A. Abuh, L. Njoku, D. Oladimeji, T. Omoloye and O. Ojo (2008). Stakeholders groan under the effect of the strike. The Guardian, 26 July: 50-53.
    10. Jimoh, M.A., S. Nwakaudu, O.A. Aliu and R. Salau (2008). Senate panel to meet Yar’Adua on teachers’ strike. The Guardian, 4 July: 1.
    11. Nwakaudu, S. and J. Ogiji (2008). Minister, NUT differ on teachers’ strike. The Guardian,22 July: 112.
    12. Oguejiofor-Abugu, F. (2008). Who will cry with the teachers. The Guardian, 5 July, 11.
    13. Olayinka, C. (2008). Teachers seek removal of Education Minister, suspend strike. The Guardian, 14 June: 2.
    14. Olayinka, C., W. Shadare and C. Ezeokoli (2008). NUT orders picketing of private schools. The Guardian, 2 July: 1.
    15. Onuorah, M. (2008). VP,  govs, others invite teachers to fresh talks. The Guardian, 18 July: 3.
    16. Onuorah, M., M. Abubakar, T. Dako, A, Fagbemi, T. Omofoye and J. Alabi (2008). Teachers down tools, government rules out talks. NECO shifts exams. The Guardian,12 June: 1.
    17. Onuorah, M., J. Ogbodo, M. Abubakar, M.A. Jimoh, C. Olayinka and A. Abuh (2008). Govt warns NUT against closure of private schools The Guardian, 3 July: 1.
    18. Oyekanmi, R.L. and N. Musa (2008). Lagos, Borno ask teachers to end strike. The Guardian, 30 July: 6.
    19. Popoola, I. (2008). Placating teachers back to class. The Guardian, 22 July: 39.
    20. Teachers strike cripples schools/schools paralysed nationwide (2008). The Guardian, 1 July: 1-2.
    21. Teachers strike stalls release of NABTEB results (2008). The Guardian, 26 July: 1.

THE POLITICS OF CITATION: AN ANALYSIS OF DOCTORAL THESES ACROSS DISCIPLINES  Pages 193-211

Joseph B.A. Afful and Hilary Janks

Download Full Text

  • Citation is used as a measure to rank academics and institutions on the assumption that the more one is cited, the greater the impact of one’s research. For this reason, citations in high impact journals that appear on highly regarded scientific indices are favoured as sites for publishing one’s work. There can be no doubt that citation in the academy is a politicized practice.  In acquiring advanced academic literacy, students have to master the art of positioning themselves in relation to the work of others, so that they develop their own ‘scholarly identity’. Drawing on insights from sociology of knowledge, information science, and critical discourse analysis, in this paper, we examine the reference lists of ten doctoral theses, from three disciplines – Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences, Literature, and Sociology – in a leading South African university.  Four parameters: (1) authorship (2) type of source (3) place of publication and (4) date of publication are used as means of understanding differences in relation to knowledge construction across the different disciplines. The analysis of the reference lists shows that they are a highly politicized discursive site marked by particular values, alliances, allegiances, and dominant forms that are privileged. The findings from this study have important implications for advanced academic literacy, disciplinary discourse studies at doctoral level, and postgraduate supervision.
    1. Abdoulaye, K. (2004). Research trends in the Humanities: An analysis of Master’s theses at the International Islamic University Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science 9 (1): 59-68.
    2. Agger B. (1991). A Critical Theory of Public life: Knowledge, Discourse and Politics in the Age of Decline.  London: Falmer Press.
    3. Bahr, A.H. and M. Zemon (2000). Collaborative authorship in the journal literature perspectives for academic librarians who wish to publish. College & Research Libraries (2000) 410-419.
    4. Bakhtin, M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    5. Bazerman, C. (1981). What written knowledge does.  Philosophy of the Social Sciences 2: 361-387.
    6. Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in different scientific areas.  Journal of Applied Psychology 57: 195-203.
    7. Becher, T. (1989). Academic Tribes and Territories. Milton Keynes: Open University Press).
    8. Brophy, P., S. Fisher and H. Booth (2003). Edner: Formative Evaluation of the Distributed National Electronic Resource: Analysis of Student Citations (Deliverable A1, EDNER Project. Manchester: CERLIM (The Centre for Research in Library & Information Management.
    9. Budd, J. (1986).  Characteristics of written scholarship in American literature: A citation study. Library and Information Science Research 8:  189-211.
    10. Buttlar, L. (1999). Information sources in Library and Information Science doctoral research. Library & Information Science Research 21(2): 227-245.
    11. Cullars, J. (1988). Characteristics of monographic scholarship of foreign literary studies by native speakers of English. College and Research Libraries 49: 157-170.
    12. Davenport, E. and H. Synder (1995). Who cites women? Whom do women cite? An exploration of gender and scholarly citation in Sociology. Journal of Documentation 41 (4): 404-410.
    13. Davis, P.M. and S. Cohen (2001). The effect of the web on undergraduate citation behavior 1996-1999. Journal of the American Society for Information Science &  Technology 52 (4): 309-314.
    14. Forgacs D. (1988). A Gramsci Reader. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
    15. Foucault, M., (1980).  Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977.  London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
    16. Frost, C.O. (1979). The use of citations in literary research: A preliminary classification of citation functions. Library Quarterly 49: 399-414.
    17. Garfield, E. (1983). How to use citation analysis for faculty evaluations and when is it relevant? Part 1 Current Comments 44: 354-361.
    18. Glanzel, W., B. Schlemmer, A, Schubert and B. Thijs (2006). Proceedings literature as additional data source for bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics 68 (3): 457-473.
    19. Gooden, A.M. (2001). Citation analysis of chemistry doctoral dissertation: An Ohio State University Case Study. Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship (2001)
    20. Gross, P.L.K. and E.M. Gross (1927). College libraries and chemical education. Science 66 (October): 385-389.
    21. Gupta, S. (1984). An analysis of theses literature of science and technology of Nigerian universities for the period 1948-1978. Nigerian Library and Information Science Review 2 (1): 37-38.
    22. Hakanson, M. (2005). The impact of gender in citations: An analysis of ‘College & Research Libraries’, ‘Journal of Academic Librarianship’, and ‘Library Quarterly’. College & Research Libraries 312-323.
    23. Haycock, L.A. (2004). Citation analysis of education dissertation for collection development. Library Resources & Technical Services 48 (2): 102-106.
    24. Heidenwolf, T. (1994). Evaluating an interdisciplinary research collection. Collection Management, 18: 33-48.
    25. Herubel, J. –P.V.M. (1991). Philosophy dissertation bibliographies and citation in serials evaluation. The Serials Librarians 20 (2/3): 65-73.
    26. Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Harlow: Longman.
    27. Iya, A.I. (1996). A citation study of Education dissertations at the University of Maiduguri, Nigeria. African Journal of Library, Archives and Information Science 6 (2): 129-132.
    28. Kamler, B and P. Thomson (2006). Helping Doctoral Students Write: Pedagogical for Supervision. London: Routledge.
    29. Koenig, M.E.D. (1978). Citation analysis for the Arts and Humanities as a collection management tool. Collection Management 2: 247-261.
    30. Kolb, D.A. (1981). Learning styles and disciplinary differences. In A. Chickering (ed.), The Modern American College. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass
    31. Kristeva, J. (1986). Word, dialogue, and the novel. In T. Moi (ed.), The Kristeva Reader. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    32. Kroc, R.J. (1984). Using citation analysis to assess scholarly productivity. Educational  Researcher 13 (6): 17-22.
    33. Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    34. Kushkowski, J.D., K.A. Parsons and W.H. Wiese. (2003). Master’s and doctoral thesis citations: Analysis and trends of a longitudinal study. Libraries and the Academy 3 (3): 459-479.
    35. Kuyper-Rushing, L. (1999). Identifying uniform core journal titles for Music libraries: A dissertation citation study. College & Research Libraries 60 (2): 153–163.
    36. Leiding, R. (2005). Using citation checking of undergraduate honors thesis bibliographies to evaluate library collections. College & Research Libraries pages 417-430.
    37. MacDonald, S. (1994). Professional Academic Writing in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
    38. Magrill, R.M. and G. St. Clair (1990). Undergraduate term paper citations patterns by disciplines and level of courses. Collection Building of Management 12 (3/4): 25-56.
    39. Martin, J. (1967). An examination of citation indexes. ASLIB Proceedings 17: 185-196.
    40. Okiy, R.B. (2003). A citation analysis of education dissertations at the Delta State University, Abraka, Nigeria. Collection Building 22 (4): 158-161.
    41. Pennycook, A. (1994). The Cultural Politics of English as an International Language. London: Longman.
    42. Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical Applied Linguistics: A Critical Introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    43. Oppenheim, C. and R. Smith (2001). Student citation practices in an information science department. Education for Information 19: 299-323.
    44. Slutz, M.J. (1997). A citation analysis of Master’s level English theses submitted to the Department of English – Kent State University 1985-1995. Master’s research paper, Kent State University.
    45. Smith, L.C. (1981). Citation analysis. Library Trends 30 (1): 83-106.
    46. Speier, C., J. Palmer, D. Wren and S. Hahn (1999). Faculty perceptions of electronic journals as scholarly communication: A question of prestige and legitimacy.  Journal of the American Society for Information Science 50 (6): 537-549.
    47. Stone, S. (1982). Progress in documentation: Humanities scholars, information needs anduses. Journal of Documentation 38: 292-313.
    48. Sylvia, M.J. (1998). Citation analysis as an unobtrusive method for journal evaluation using Psychology student research bibliographies. Collection Building 17 (1): 20-28.
    49. Sylvia, M. and M. Lescher (1995). What journals do Psychology graduate students need: A citation analysis of thesis references. College & Research Libraries 56: 313-318.
    50. Tescione, S.M. (1998). A woman’s name: Implications for publication, citation and tenure. Educational Researcher 27 (8): 38-42.
    51. Thompson, C. (2007). Authority is everything: A study of the politics of textual ownership and knowledge in the formation of student writer identities. Retrieved on 20th May, 2007 at http://www.ojs.unisa.eduau/journals/index.php/IJEI/article/view/1818
    52. Usha, M., C.P. Vashishth and J.N. Gautam (1993). Research collaboration in agricultural sciences. ILA Bull.  28: 57-60.
    53. Walcott, R. (1991). Characteristics of citations in geoscience doctoral dissertations accepted at United States academic institutions 1981-1985. Science & Technology Libraries 12 (2):5-16.
    54. Waytowich, V.L., A.J. Onwuegbuzie and Q.G. Jiao (2006). Characteristics of doctoral students who commit citation errors. Library Review 55 (3): 195-208.
    55. Weintraub, K.J. (1980). The humanistic scholar and the library. Library Quarterly 50 (1): 22-39.
    56. Williams, V.K. and C.L. Fletcher (2006). Materials used by Master’s students in engineering and implications for collection developments: A citation analysis. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship.
    57. Wodak, R. and M. Meyer (eds.) (2001). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage
    58. Zainab, A.N. and S.S. Goi (1997). Characteristics of citation used by Humanities researchers. Malaysia Journal of Library & Information Science 2 (2): 19-36.