Valuing our soil


12 September 2018 10:46
A montage showing fruit and vegetables, and landscapes.

Researchers at Lancaster University have helped produce a series of new reports designed to enable the UK to make the most of its natural assets.

The four new reports on Natural Capital published today will enable governments and businesses to take an evidence-based approach to valuing the UK’s natural assets. 

Drs Victoria Janes Bassett and Jessica Davies of Lancaster University are the authors of Soil Natural Capital valuation in agri-food businesses.

Natural Capital refers to the assets within our natural environment that provide benefits for humans. Plants, animals, freshwater, soil, minerals, air and oceans all contribute to Natural Capital. The concept lies at the heart of the UK Government’s recently published 25 Year Environment Plan and is set to play an increasingly influential role in public policy and business decision-making.

The new reports, published by the Valuing Nature Programme, which is co-ordinated by the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (CEH), summarise the science available to inform a Natural Capital approach in four key areas:

·        The Natural Capital valuation of floodplains in relation to preventing floods, storing carbon, and supporting biodiversity.

·        The Natural Capital valuation of soil in relation to producing food, storing carbon and regulating water supply.

·        Natural Capital trade-offs from the afforestation of peatlands in relation to the effect on storing carbon, controlling water supply, supporting biodiversity, providing recreational spaces and preserving a record of the past.

·        How businesses are using Natural Capital assessments in practice.

A fifth report, on the Natural Capital of temporary rivers, has already been published, highlighting their varied benefits including supporting biodiversity plus drought and flood control.

The reports, funded by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC), also identify evidence gaps and make recommendations for further collaborative action by government, business and academia. For example, the authors recommend further research into the effect of changes in land use and climate on soil and identify the need for better datasets and simulation models to enable monetary assessments of Natural Capital.

Dr Jess Davies said: “The scientific community have lots of approaches that can give us a better picture of the value of soils, but we need better data and tools to help us predict how this natural asset is changing over time and the consequences for businesses, food security and health. Understanding future change and the returns on management options is key to reducing risks and mobilising investment.”

Dr Anita Weatherby of CEH, who manages the Valuing Nature Programme said: “The Valuing Nature Programme works to make knowledge from diverse research disciplines easier for decision-makers to use. These reports summarise the evidence available to inform a Natural Capital approach, and show some of the challenges where further research is needed.”

Dr Peter Young, chair of the Business Interest Group for the Valuing Nature Programme, said “The UK has a world-class research capability in understanding and valuing the natural environment, but outputs are often hard for mainstream business to access and interpret. These reports provide accessible and authoritative knowledge which can be readily applied by all who impact on relevant natural assets as part of their core activities.” 

Back to News