{"id":7189,"date":"2019-05-22T15:54:10","date_gmt":"2019-05-22T15:54:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/g\/"},"modified":"2019-06-26T15:31:12","modified_gmt":"2019-06-26T15:31:12","slug":"g","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/g\/","title":{"rendered":"g"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Short for a &#8216;general (ability) factor&#8217;, it contributes to the observed correlations among many measures of cognitive ability and thereby constitutes one way of conceptualizing general intelligence. &nbsp;It first appeared in a paper published by <a href=\"http:\/\/psychclassics.yorku.ca\/Spearman\/\" class=\"cc-route-enabled\" target=\"_self\" data-editable-link=\"http:\/\/psychclassics.yorku.ca\/Spearman\/&amp;target=_self\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Charles Spearman<\/a> (1863-1945) in 1904. &nbsp;Based on his analysis of the performance of school-aged children on a wide variety of tests, he concluded that because the resultant measures were positively correlated there must be an underlying &#8216;g&#8217; factor that accounts for their associations. &nbsp;Thus was born his two-factor theory of intelligence, and which led to the application of factor analysis in psychology. &nbsp;According to this theory, there is not only a &#8216;g&#8217; factor, but also a number of specific factors (&#8216;s&#8217; factors) that have low correlations among them. Over the years, the theory has engendered vigorous debate about the nature of human intelligence. &nbsp;One of its severest critics was <a href=\"http:\/\/stephen%20jay%20gould\/\" class=\"cc-route-enabled\" target=\"_self\" data-editable-link=\"http:\/\/Stephen%20Jay%20Gould&amp;target=_self\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Stephen Jay Gould<\/a> in his book The <span class=\"\" style=\"font-style: italic;\">mismeasure of man<\/span> (1981) in which he claimed that the &#8216;g&#8217; factor had been reified as physically residing in the brain, and also that there are a number of factor analytical solutions of test data that do not yield a &#8216;g&#8217; factor. &nbsp;His claims have been regarded by some also as a form of <a href=\"http:\/\/discovermagazine.com\/2012\/jan-feb\/59\/\" class=\"cc-route-enabled\" target=\"_self\" data-editable-link=\"http:\/\/discovermagazine.com\/2012\/jan-feb\/59\/&amp;target=_self\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">dogma<\/a>. &nbsp;There is also a debate about whether a &#8216;g&#8217; factor is also evident in other animals as revealed in performances, for example, of mice, rhesus monkeys and rats on a variety cognitive tasks. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>See <a href=\"crystallized_intelligence\">Crystallized intelligence<\/a>, <a href=\"factor_analysis\">Factor analysis<\/a>, <a href=\"fluid_intelligence\">Fluid intelligence<\/a>, <a href=\"intelligence\">Intelligence<\/a>, <a href=\"learning_disability\">Learning disability<\/a>, <a href=\"reification\">Reification<\/a>, <a href=\"theory_of_multiple_intelligences\">Theory of multiple intelligences<\/a>, Triarchic theory of Intelligence<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Short for a &#8216;general (ability) factor&#8217;, it contributes to the observed correlations among many measures of cognitive ability and thereby constitutes one way of conceptualizing general intelligence. &nbsp;It first appeared in a paper published by Charles Spearman (1863-1945) in 1904. &nbsp;Based on his analysis of the performance of school-aged children on a wide variety of &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/g\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;g&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[2],"class_list":["post-7189","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-glossary","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7189","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7189"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7189\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9486,"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7189\/revisions\/9486"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7189"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7189"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7189"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}