{"id":7425,"date":"2019-05-22T15:56:44","date_gmt":"2019-05-22T15:56:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/canon_of_parsimony\/"},"modified":"2019-05-22T15:56:44","modified_gmt":"2019-05-22T15:56:44","slug":"canon_of_parsimony","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/canon_of_parsimony\/","title":{"rendered":"Canon of parsimony"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Generally considered to be a special case of Ockham&#8217;s razor in its application to animal or comparative psychology made by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.gly.bris.ac.uk\/www\/history\/biogs\/lloyd-morgan.html\" class=\"cc-route-enabled\" target=\"_self\" data-editable-link=\"http:\/\/www.gly.bris.ac.uk\/www\/history\/biogs\/lloyd-morgan.html&amp;target=_self\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">C. Lloyd Morgan<\/a> (1852-1936) in his <span class=\"\" style=\"font-style: italic;\">Introduction to comparative psychology<\/span> (1894). &nbsp;Prior to Morgan, <a href=\"http:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/entries\/wilhelm-wundt\/\" class=\"cc-route-enabled\" target=\"_self\" data-editable-link=\"http:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/entries\/wilhelm-wundt\/&amp;target=_self\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Wilhelm Wundt<\/a> (1832-1920) put forward a similar idea in his <span class=\"\" style=\"font-style: italic;\">Lectures on human and animal psychology<\/span> (1863). &nbsp;The canon is summarised in the <span class=\"\" style=\"font-style: italic;\">Introduction<\/span> with the well-known sentence as follows: &#8220;In no case may we interpret an action as the outcome of the exercise of a higher psychical faculty, if it can be interpreted as the outcome of the exercise of one which stands lower in the psychological scale&#8221; (p. 53). &nbsp;Given this description, it is surprising that the canon was assumed to be a justification for the anti-mentalism of behaviourism during its dominant years in psychology. &nbsp;As <a href=\"http:\/\/www.brynmawr.edu\/psychology\/rwozniak\/\" class=\"cc-route-enabled\" target=\"_self\" data-editable-link=\"http:\/\/www.brynmawr.edu\/psychology\/rwozniak\/&amp;target=_self\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Robert H. Wozniak<\/a>, and others, have&nbsp;pointed out, this assumption was misplaced. &nbsp;In effect, Morgan&#8217;s canon does not amount to a principle of parsimony as it does not eradicate mental processes or hold that the only focus of study should be observable behaviour. &nbsp;Rather, it is an appeal to psychologists that they should know their own minds if they are to understand the conscious experience of other animals. &nbsp;Thus, it is not a denial of mental events in animals in the name of parsimony, but instead the opposite. &nbsp;More to the point, it was intended as a guide to psychologists as to how to use their own introspections in studying animal behavior within the broader context of a concern for mental evolution. &nbsp;In this respect, the canon emphasised the avoidance of imposing &#8216;higher&#8217; mental functions on interpretations of animal behavior when &#8216;lower&#8217; ones would suffice.<\/p>\n<p>See Akaike&#8217;s information criterion, <a href=\"comparative_method\">Comparative method<\/a>, <a href=\"ockham-s_-or_occam-s-_razor\">Ockham&#8217;s (or Occam&#8217;s) razor<\/a>, Operationalism<\/p>\n<p><\/body><\/html><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Generally considered to be a special case of Ockham&#8217;s razor in its application to animal or comparative psychology made by C. Lloyd Morgan (1852-1936) in his Introduction to comparative psychology (1894). &nbsp;Prior to Morgan, Wilhelm Wundt (1832-1920) put forward a similar idea in his Lectures on human and animal psychology (1863). &nbsp;The canon is summarised &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/canon_of_parsimony\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Canon of parsimony&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[2],"class_list":["post-7425","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-glossary","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7425","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7425"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7425\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7425"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7425"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7425"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}