{"id":8238,"date":"2019-05-22T16:05:32","date_gmt":"2019-05-22T16:05:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/intentionality\/"},"modified":"2019-05-22T16:05:32","modified_gmt":"2019-05-22T16:05:32","slug":"intentionality","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/intentionality\/","title":{"rendered":"Intentionality"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>There are two ways philosophers have distinguished intentionality:&nbsp;1. intentional sign (or true intentionality):&nbsp;mental representation of a goal to be attained or a certain effect to be produced, and 2. intentional act (or intentional communication):&nbsp;an awareness that one&#8217;s behavior can produce outcomes or effects in general. &nbsp;Sometimes referred to in the psychology of learning as &#8216;contingency awareness&#8217; or perceiving that reactions made by objects or other people are contingent on your behavior (i.e., what you do). &nbsp;In other words, it is perceiving that your behavior is effective in producing a change in the world around you. &nbsp;The question then is how intentional signs develop from intentional acts. For Piaget, this occurs by mean of circular reactions going from primary (repetition of movements that produce interesting &#8216;spectacles&#8217; or events;&nbsp;stage 2 sensorimotor period, 1.5-4 months), secondary (awareness of relationship of own actions to environment, cf. contingency awareness;&nbsp;stage 3, 4-8 months) and tertiary circular reactions (deliberate variation of problem-solving means = experimentation with different means to obtain the same end state or outcome (stage 5, 12-18 months). &nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.kaye.com\/mslb\/\" class=\"cc-route-enabled\" target=\"_self\" data-editable-link=\"http:\/\/www.kaye.com\/mslb\/&amp;target=_self\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Kenneth Kaye<\/a> would subscribe to this view of how intentionality develops, but differs from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/aus\/catalogue\/catalogue.asp?isbn=9780521651172\" class=\"cc-route-enabled\" target=\"_self\" data-editable-link=\"http:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/aus\/catalogue\/catalogue.asp?isbn=9780521651172?target=_self\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Piaget <\/a>in emphasising the role of caregivers in promoting it as in his apprenticeship model. &nbsp;In this latter respect, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/aus\/catalogue\/catalogue.asp?isbn=9780521651172\" class=\"cc-route-enabled\" target=\"_self\" data-editable-link=\"http:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/aus\/catalogue\/catalogue.asp?isbn=9780521651172?target=_self\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Vygotsky&#8217;<\/a>s Zone of Proximal Development is very similar to Kaye&#8217;s apprenticeship model and what others have called &#8216;guided participation&#8217;. &nbsp;In contrast, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.psych.uw.edu.pl\/lasc\/Trevarthen2.pdf\" target=\"_self\" data-editable-link=\"http:\/\/www.psych.uw.edu.pl\/lasc\/Trevarthen2.pdf&amp;target=_self\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Colwyn Trevarthen<\/a> assumes &#8216;intentionality&#8217; (which he sometimes refers to as motivations for action) to be a &#8216;given&#8217; at birth and it is the starting point for his theory of development and in this respect he distinguishes between two exclusive modes of intentional actions:&nbsp;the communicative and the praxic modes. However, it is not clear from his writings when he is referring to intentional actions and when to intentional signs.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>See <a href=\"zone_of_proximal_development_-zpd-\">Zone of proximal development (ZPD)<\/a><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><\/body><\/html><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There are two ways philosophers have distinguished intentionality:&nbsp;1. intentional sign (or true intentionality):&nbsp;mental representation of a goal to be attained or a certain effect to be produced, and 2. intentional act (or intentional communication):&nbsp;an awareness that one&#8217;s behavior can produce outcomes or effects in general. &nbsp;Sometimes referred to in the psychology of learning as &#8216;contingency &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/intentionality\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Intentionality&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[2],"class_list":["post-8238","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-glossary","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8238","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8238"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8238\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8238"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8238"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8238"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}