{"id":8620,"date":"2019-05-22T16:09:41","date_gmt":"2019-05-22T16:09:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/ockham-s_-or_occam-s-_razor\/"},"modified":"2019-05-22T16:09:41","modified_gmt":"2019-05-22T16:09:41","slug":"ockham-s_-or_occam-s-_razor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/ockham-s_-or_occam-s-_razor\/","title":{"rendered":"Ockham&#8217;s (or Occam&#8217;s) razor"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A form of methodological reductionism, it is the scientific mandate originating with <a href=\"http:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/entries\/ockham\/\" class=\"cc-route-enabled\" target=\"_self\" data-editable-link=\"http:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/entries\/ockham\/&amp;target=_self\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">William of Ockham <\/a>(1285-1349), sometimes referred to as the &#8216;parsimony of postulates&#8217;, and summarised with the acronym KISS (&#8216;keep it simple, stupid&#8217;). &nbsp;It contains the idea, fundamental to the scientific method, that one should not make more assumptions than the minimum needed or, equivalently, choose from a set of otherwise equivalent models or theories the simplest one. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thenagain.info\/Classes\/Sources\/Newton.html\" class=\"cc-route-enabled\" target=\"_self\" data-editable-link=\"http:\/\/www.thenagain.info\/Classes\/Sources\/Newton.html&amp;target=_self\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Isaac Newton <\/a>(1642-1721) formulated it as follows:&nbsp;&#8220;We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances.&#8221; &nbsp;Almost two centuries later, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.informationphilosopher.com\/solutions\/scientists\/mach\/\" class=\"cc-route-enabled\" target=\"_self\" data-editable-link=\"http:\/\/www.informationphilosopher.com\/solutions\/scientists\/mach\/&amp;target=_self\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Ernst Mach<\/a> (1838-1960), with his principle of economy, advocated a version of Ockham&#8217;s razor in stating:&nbsp;&#8220;Scientists must use the simplest means of arriving at their results and exclude everything not perceived by the senses&#8221;. &nbsp;Another re-statement of the principle is Morgan&#8217;s canon of parsimony introduced into comparative psychology. &nbsp;The principle is sometimes incorrectly equated with the statement purportedly made by Albert Einstein (1879-1955) in 1933 that &#8220;Theories should be as simple as possible, but no simpler&#8221;. &nbsp;It is often the case, however, that the simplest explanation is not necessarily the best. &nbsp;Finally, not everybody has regarded Ockam&#8217;s principle as a scientific mandate to be followed by all sciences. &nbsp;For example, Francis Crick (1916-2004) in an article entitled &#8216;Lessons from biology&#8217;, published in <span class=\"\" style=\"font-style: italic;\">Natural History<\/span> (November, 1988, pp. 32-39) wrote:&nbsp;&#8220;While Occam&#8217;s razor is a useful tool in the physical sciences, it can be a very dangerous implement in biology. It is thus very rash to use simplicity and elegance as a guide in biological research.&#8221; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>See Akaike&#8217;s information criterion, <a href=\"canon_of_parsimony\">Canon of parsimony<\/a>, <a href=\"experimental_method\">Experimental method<\/a>, <a href=\"operationalism\">Operationalism<\/a>, <a href=\"reductionism\">Reductionism<\/a><\/p>\n<p><\/body><\/html><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A form of methodological reductionism, it is the scientific mandate originating with William of Ockham (1285-1349), sometimes referred to as the &#8216;parsimony of postulates&#8217;, and summarised with the acronym KISS (&#8216;keep it simple, stupid&#8217;). &nbsp;It contains the idea, fundamental to the scientific method, that one should not make more assumptions than the minimum needed or, &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/ockham-s_-or_occam-s-_razor\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Ockham&#8217;s (or Occam&#8217;s) razor&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[2],"class_list":["post-8620","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-glossary","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8620","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8620"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8620\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8620"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8620"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/fas\/psych\/glossary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8620"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}