216 THE STONES OF VENICE III. NATURALISM
representation of facts. Good colouring does not necessarily convey the image of anything but itself. It consists in certain proportions and arrangements of rays of light, but not in likenesses to anything. A few touches of certain greys and purples laid by a master’s hand on white paper will be good colouring; as more touches are added beside them, we may find out that they were intended to represent a dove’s neck, and we may praise, as the drawing advances, the perfect imitation of the dove’s neck.1 But the good colouring does not consist in that imitation, but in the abstract qualities and relations of the grey and purple.
In like manner, as soon as a great sculptor begins to shape his work out of the block, we shall see that its lines are nobly arranged, and of noble character. We may not have the slightest idea for what the forms are intended, whether they are of man or beast, of vegetation or drapery. Their likeness to anything does not affect their nobleness. They are magnificent forms, and that is all we need care to know of them, in order to say whether the workman is a good or bad sculptor.
§ 43. Now the noblest art is an exact unison of the abstract value, with the imitative power, of forms and colours. It is the noblest composition, used to express the noblest facts. But the human mind cannot in general unite the two perfections: it either pursues the fact to the neglect
not what else and composition; the speakers in each case attaching a perfectly different meaning to the word, generally an indistinct one, and always a wrong one. Composition is, in plain English, “putting together,” and it means the putting together of lines, of forms, of colours, of shades, or of ideas. Painters compose in colour, compose in thought, compose in form, and compose in effect; the word being of use merely in order to express a scientific, disciplined, and inventive arrangement of any of these, instead of a merely natural or accidental one.2
1 [Ruskin was thinking perhaps of Turner’s sketch of a dove at Farnley which he greatly admired (see On the Old Road, 1899, iii. § 281), and of William Hunt’s dove, which his father had just bought (see Notes on Prout and Hunt, No. 145).]
2 [For Ruskin’s full discussions of composition in art, see Elements of Drawing, Letter iii., and Modern Painters, vol. v. pt. viii. ch. i.]
[Version 0.04: March 2008]