[M2.155L] [M2.155] 155
may be authoritatively set forth by ministers of the
Church of England: it is not therefore to them that this
letter is addressed A much larger class are I trust
those who allowing a certain efficacy to Baptism, they hardly
know what, perhaps more as an act of obedience
than as a Sacrament yet would certainly deny that Christ
was more ready to receive their children then than at any
other time or that there was any correspondence between
the presenting them at the font, and the bringing them "to
the presence of Christ and to his arms."
I entreat those persons at this juncture carefully to consider
and determine
1st. What efficacy they suppose to belong to the act at all.
2nd. In what manner this determined efficacy is attached to it.
1st. Be clear in your conception of its efficacy; and in order
A to do this, do not confuse the question - what Baptism
is, and conveys with the question, whether infants
should be baptised or not - above all do not argue that
Because baptism is bestowed on infants, there it can only
mean this or that. You are not distinctly told in the
Bible that Baptism should be given to Infants; but you
are told very distinctly what Baptism is. Receive
therefore from the Bible as you would from another book
what you are told distinctly before what you are told
indistinctly. Treat the question of Infant Baptism
separately altogether
[Version 0.05: May 2008]