[M2.14backL] [M2.14back] 14
(1) inexpedient, except as they enable the architect more
conveniently to place the superincumbent weight; Thus a
double or treble group of slender shafts may {sometimes}
more conveniently bear a longitudinal pressure than a
single massy one.
(2) With all this license of proportion, there is however a
limit to the employment of the detached shaft above a
certain scale: The roof of a building is of course of the
same weight, placed high or low; but the shafts which
are strong enough to support it when it is at no very
great height from the ground, are not strong enough to
Yet consider the entire height of the piers of Milan: bear their own added weight {as well} when they are indefinitely
Very noble but they are clustered shafts: and the niche prolonged upwards; Here very tall detached shafts
capitals are a mere banding; the mouldings merge the same must be of a thickness altogether disproportionate to the
above; There is an ungraceful variety in these capitals weight they have to carry: and are therefore always ungraceful:
some being surrounded by six flat foliated and gabled Great elevation must therefore be attained
canopies, and very ugly; and others composed of true either by slender shafts, supported by walls; or by walls
projecting niches. of a thickness sufficient alone to sustain the weight of
the roof - or else by superimposition of successive ranks
of detached shafts.
(3) The question propriety of superimposition has {only} been much disputed
because it has not been fitly considered that it is
the only means of constructing elevated buildings of detached
shafts whose
[Version 0.05: May 2008]