[M2.14backL] [M2.14back] 14 (1) inexpedient, except as they enable the architect more conveniently to place the superincumbent weight; Thus a double or treble group of slender shafts may {sometimes} more conveniently bear a longitudinal pressure than a single massy one. (2) With all this license of proportion, there is however a limit to the employment of the detached shaft above a certain scale: The roof of a building is of course of the same weight, placed high or low; but the shafts which are strong enough to support it when it is at no very great height from the ground, are not strong enough to Yet consider the entire height of the piers of Milan: bear their own added weight {as well} when they are indefinitely Very noble but they are clustered shafts: and the niche prolonged upwards; Here very tall detached shafts capitals are a mere banding; the mouldings merge the same must be of a thickness altogether disproportionate to the above; There is an ungraceful variety in these capitals weight they have to carry: and are therefore always ungraceful: some being surrounded by six flat foliated and gabled Great elevation must therefore be attained canopies, and very ugly; and others composed of true either by slender shafts, supported by walls; or by walls projecting niches. of a thickness sufficient alone to sustain the weight of the roof - or else by superimposition of successive ranks of detached shafts. (3) Thequestionpropriety of superimposition has {only} been much disputed because it has not been fitly considered that it is the only means of constructing elevated buildings of detached shafts whose
[Version 0.05: May 2008]