234 10
with that of its superstructure, applied entirely to the
area of its own base, may not crush the materials or dis-
turb the joints of the foundation: The wider and deeper
their stone on which the pillar is based, the better;
but it evidently must not be mdde wide without being
deep. For in such case, as, suppose at a opposite, there
would be a strong probability of the foundation stone’s bre[a]
breaking in the centre, as at 6; in which case the build-
ing would instantly become unstable; while if no founda-
tion stone had been employed at all, the pillar might
have sunk gradually into the ground without in any wise
losing its stability; The more solid the block therefore
the better; and the larger the better, up to the point
at which it loses its subordinati[o]on to the pier, and be-
comes a needless weight of stone requiring a foundation
for itself. Supposing the foundation of the whole edifice
itself solid and well knit, the most natural and simple
form of base would be a block projecting (certainly not
more than one half the diameter of the column on each
side of it) to about the degree of the jut of the capital,
and of the not less depth than two thirds of its width,
as a2 Evidently however, when the pier is large, such
an arrangement would greatly i[u]nterfere with the acces
sibility and convenience
[Version 0.05: May 2008]