68 68
angle shaft, secondly fr. its di[o]sturbed tracery rudely
given at p 39 1 door book. The central trefoil should be
symmetrical but the relation of the cutting out of the
Note The great det. 5th in the Pal. Pruli b[s]eside the prin- cusp is true as compared with that of the semi lateral
cipal finestrata have had cusps lime the rest, now cut trefoil. The fact is the semicircle is described with
away. I am particularly puzzled in this palace by the the outer roll of tracery; Then the inner mouldings make
introduction of the heads in the capitals; the cupped ones the space to be foliated too small and in order to give
have indeed an early look - but the others are blundering i[n] the effect of a semi trefoil, the foils made[are] even less
palace. The whole has been however so patched that it than semicircles, and the spandril space is thrown nearly
would need as much work as the Ducal palace itself to dis- upright: Yet the figure if complete would not be a 4
entangle it. foil, it is altogether nondescript and deceives the eye so
Compare house No 94 p 42 Door book. cleverly that I did not see it till I drew the tracery
This is the most remarkable instance I have yet obtained
of Italian adjustment.
The tracery bar is given real size with root of cusp, p
76 1 Gothic book, fig 1 the arch with cusp profile fig 2
the surrounding square moulding with the tracery "junction
bery anomalous?) p 78 fig 3. the capital of the great
angle shaft, shaft of greay granite, far greater strength
I suppose) fig 4. the pil head fig 5. The angle shaft
has a plain raised leaf base; the pils have a dog tooth
on the base, and a curious emergent small shaft half way
up, which has carried something, now broken away; they
are bold cch and have florid capitals with child heads
vilely cut.
[Version 0.05: May 2008]