262 212
ST MARKS NICHES.
how curiously manly and simple as opposed to the filigree
niches with rib vaulting of even earlier times - Bayeau
for instance in the north. Fig 1 p 62 1 is the masonry
on above head at angle; going on each side to edge of
capital fig 1 p 62 profile in front. fig 2 p 63 the
dentil at the top showing joints and the curius intaglio
diamond, now to me at angle of dentil and the neat touch-
ing of the apex of arch under centre of dentil block
All should be much neater than I have drawn it. Fig 3
p 63 1 shows relation of the leaden flower to size of
spandril finally at p 61 is the profile of cusp -
The arch dentil is only about 1/2 to 2/3 the width of angle wonderfully pure and beautiful for this style, cut clear
and cornice dentil Correct this in fig 1 p 62 it is and at p 61 1 continued on p 61 is the section of arch
right at p 62 1. The manage[m]ment of angle dentil at p mouldings real size note that the dentil is small and flat
64 1 a profile b c sections the blocks joining each as compared with angle dentil (which from its mode of
other. turning is necessarly bold): the cavette singularly
sha[w]llow[a], the roll as singulaely bold. The line b at p 61
is section at base and apex of arch. b2 at penetration of
cusp, c the cusp itself ought to be about 2 inches wide,
i.e. d e in fig 1.
This niche would be perfectly beautiful but for its
leaden flowers a great fault common to all the rest.
Its shafts have no bases: capitals noted at p 50,
somewhat roughyl cut when seen close bu[y]t very perfect in
effect; It has a very noble, slightly colossal
armed figure, Michael? Which has chain mail under a
jointed cuirass - or rather jointed body armour. This
figure appears
[Version 0.05: May 2008]