Previous Page Close Next Page
fol. 62r [fol. 61v is blank] 'Of Truth of Space … Focus of the Eye' (Pt II, Sn II, Ch IV) (3.320-21)
39
#65#< Turner alone to reach . the truth of nature in this respect. I shall
endeavour to show by what means The first step was to destroy
the appearance of intersection between the lines . <Thousa> Many
artifices were employed to effect his - but the chief was that of destroying
5 one of the outlines - generally that of the distance - wherever it <crossed> {met}
a decided line of near object >
But. be it observed . (and I have only to request that whatever I say
may be tested by immediate experiment ). that the difference of focus
necessary is greatest within the first 200 yards {<of>} . and that therefore - though
10 it is totally impossible to see an object within <20> {10} yards of the eye. & one
a quarter of a mile beyond it - at the same moment . it is perfectly
possible to see one a quarter of a mile off . and one five miles beyond it
at the same moment . The consequence of this is . practically . that ^ {in a real
landscape} we
can see the whole of what <is> ^ {in a picture would be} called the middle distance
& distance . with
15 facility & clearness . but while we do so - we cannot see the foreground . except
by vague & indistinct arrangements of lines & colours . and that if on the
contrary - we look at the foreground , so as to receive a distinct impression of
it - the middle distance & distance are all confusion & mystery .
And therefore . if in a painting - our foreground is anything - our distance
20 must be nothing - or - in other words - if we represent <both foreground> & {our near
& distant objects}
<distance> as <cause> giving <each> ^ {both at once} that distinct impression
to the eye . which
we receive in nature from each ^ {when we look at them} separately - and {if we}
distinguish<ed> ^ {them} <only> from
Previous Page Close Next Page
MW