Previous Page Close Next Page
fol. 64v 'Of Truth of Space … Focus of the Eye' (Pt II, Sn II, Ch IV) (3.3 )
This is not done by <shadowy> slurred or melting lines observe - (always the
sign of vice in art {<Ä
>*}) but by a decisive imperfection - a firm - but
partial assertion , of form . which the eye feels indeed to be close
5 home to it . and yet cannot rest upon <it> nor cling to <it> nor {entirely
understand} <make
out what it is - but> {& from which it} is ^ driven away <from it> of necessity
- to those <other>
parts of the <picture> {distance} - where it is intended to repose - And this principle of execution - <though> originated by Turner - & fully carried
out by him alone has been yet --- *
10 #71#Note. That is to say, if they are systematically and constantly used .
Soft and melting lines are necessary in some places, as for instance {in the
outline} <where
a round object> of <some> {anything} which turns very gradually - so
that<'s> ^ {there is} <so *..*>
a great deal of surface under the eye in every part of the outline - <and>
but in general - lines ought to be made tender by graduation and change ^
{as they proceed.}
15 not by slurring . The hardest line in the world will not be painful if it
is managed as nature manages it - that is - by pronouncing one part
disguising
<and being> another - & keeping the whole line in perpetual change . The lines
of Rubens are about as near perfection (allowing for want of refinement) as
lines can be - separated on the one hand . from the hardness of Perugino
20 or the early Italian school - {but more} on the other . from the far more
dangerous
and vicious <manner> {slurring and} melting of Murillo. A hard line is only
an imperfection
A slurred one is a falsehood . The artist whose fault is hardness may be on the
road to excellence - he whose fault is softness mustbe on the road to ruin
fol. 65r 'Of Truth of Space … Focus of the Eye' (Pt II, Sn II, Ch IV) (3.322-24) *
without giving a ^ {ny thing like completeness to} the forms of the near
objects .
#72#< And thus arose a new <manner> {principle} in art - which hitherto Turner
only
has carried to full perfection - of indicating the part of the picture
to which attention was especially directed by veiling the rest - not with
5 artificial & caricatured obscurity - as in the old masters - but by the
indistinctness and vagueness of {the} luminous outline - which suggests
everything while it attracts to nothing - a principle which we shall
see hereafter is as productive of beauty as it is <agreeable to> {preservative of}
truth . >
<But though Turner only has fully carried it out,> it has been acted on
10 with judgment & success by <many> ^ {several} less powerful artists of the
modern English school - *< in whose works it is more distinctly recognizable
as a principle of truth - because it is not so ^ {far} affected and influenced
by those of imagination > Some six years ago - the brown moorland foregrounds of Copley Fielding were most <impressively> instructive in this
15 respect. Not a line in them was made out - not a single object
^ {clearly} distinguishable - wet, broad sweeps of the brush - always truthful in
their
character & texture - sparkling - careless . and accidental as nature herself
<but never with an edge .> suggested every thing - while they represented
nothing - The focus of the eye was not <intended to> {supposed to be adapted
to} receive the near forms .
20 But - far off into the mountain distance - came the sharp edge & the clear
air -- the whole intention & execution of the picture <centreing> guided
and exerted where the impression of space & size was to be given - the
Previous Page Close Next Page
MW