John N. Towse
Graham J. Hitch
Una Hutton
Journal of Memory and language. 1998, 39, 195-217.
A common account of working memory capacity, and its development, incorporates
the notion of limited mental resources being shared between processing
and storage components. Working memory tasks are assumed to measure this
capacity. However, recent data from children's performance at one such
task, counting span, implicate forgetting over time as being more important
than the capacity for resource-sharing. Three experiments investigated
the role of temporal factors in more depth and breadth by varying the retention
requirements in working memory tasks whilst holding constant the overall
processing difficulty. Counting span, operation span, and reading span
tests in 6- to 11- year-olds were all shown to decline as the retention
interval of stimulus items is increased and, across tasks, there were no
consistent effects from different concurrent storage loads on processing
speed. It is suggested that among children, performance in these tasks
does not reflect a trade-off between resources allocated to processing
and storage, and that caution should be adopted in interpreting working
memory span in adult populations.