subtext

Home
Archive
Subscribe
Editors
Contact

 

 

 

 

 

subtext

issue 72

24 February 2011

*****************************************************

'Truth: lies open to all'

*****************************************************

Every fortnight during term-time.

All editorial correspondence to: subtext-editors [at] lancaster.ac.uk.

Please delete as soon as possible after receipt. Back issues and subscription details can be found at http://www.lancs.ac.uk/subtext.

The editors welcome letters, comments, suggestions and opinions from readers. subtext reserves the right to edit submissions.

subtext does not publish material that is submitted anonymously, but is willing to consider without obligation requests for publication with the name withheld.

For tips to prevent subtext from getting swept up into your 'junk email folder', see http://www.lancs.ac.uk/subtext/dejunk/.

*****************************************************

CONTENTS: editorial, news in brief, pensions, Catering, behind the yellow door, management-union relations II, Cary Cooper's fashion tips, Live at LICA, letters

(A report on the meeting of Council on 11 February will be included in the next issue of subtext)

*****************************************************

EDITORIAL

We learned last week that Cambridge University's internal working group on fees has recommended charging the £9000 maximum tuition fee to undergraduates from 2012, with a waiver of up to £3000 for poorer students.  Oxford University also feels it has no choice but to charge the maximum £9000 fee.  Both universities argue, reasonably, that these increases are necessary to recover the government funding they will lose in the new funding regime. 

The Cambridge working group adds that not to make the full increase would raise doubts about the University's 'commitment to excellence', and that Cambridge should charge the maximum because 'it is expected that most, if not all, of our peers will charge the maximum fee'.  Part of Oxford's reasoning for the fee increase is also, apparently, to maintain the University's reputation.

It is astonishing that these ancient universities, both very highly regarded internationally, feel their reputations might be affected by the tuition fees they charge their undergraduates.  It is equally surprising that they make reference to the fees that other universities may or may not decide to charge.  Over the past 20 years successive governments' espousal of market economics has made price the chief criterion that many people use, rightly or wrongly, to judge quality; but universities like Oxford and Cambridge might be expected to see beyond this.

After last Friday's meeting of the Finance Committee it may be that Lancaster University has already committed itself to set its 2012 fees close to the maximum, but at the very least it could set out its case for a fee increase in a more convincing way than either Oxford or Cambridge have done.  It would be heartening if Lancaster University recognised that there is more at stake here than just its own finances.

****************************************************

NEWS IN BRIEF

Ahdaf Soueif

Viewers and listeners who have followed recent events in Cairo may have seen or heard reports by the novelist, broadcaster and Lancaster graduate Ahdaf Soueif.  She was a postgrad student here in the 1970s, when she occupied a roof-top flat in the then Cartmel College (now part of County South) whilst studying for a PhD in Linguistics.  Since successfully completing her PhD, she has been married twice (her first husband died), brought up a family, and written several novels that have been well reviewed and in one case shortlisted for a Booker Prize.  Lancaster University awarded her an honorary DLitt in 2004.  She is active in support of human rights issues, particularly Palestinian rights.  Recently she has been seen addressing crowds in Tahrir Square - an act that must have required considerable courage and commitment.  A Lancaster graduate we can all admire.

******

CPU

The Campaign for the Public University will be hosting a day of workshops at Aston University in Birmingham on Saturday 5 March 2011. This will be a chance for us all to think through the possibilities for activism, to learn more about crucial areas of the education crisis, and to debate the idea of the public university itself. The day is free and open to all. To register, email publicuniversity [at] live.co.uk. For further details, see website: http://publicuniversity.org.uk/2011/02/03/re-imagining-the-public-university-a-day-of-workshops/

******

O tempora, O mores

The Education Guardian 15.2.11 reports that 'A recent survey of lap dancers by Leeds University showed one in three were working to fund education'.  The article goes on to report on a student demonstration in Hackney in which women were protesting against the proposed closure of some of East London's strip clubs, on the ground that this would reduce their opportunities to work and so to pay for their post-graduate courses.

The sexual politics surrounding these ideas are so complex, not to say mindboggling (for anyone who remembers the debates and struggles of the 1970s), as to render us temporarily speechless. (Just imagine walking into the Student Union Bar in 1973 and suggesting that the women there should be out protesting against the proposed closure of a strip club.  Times have indeed changed.)  However, if anyone knows of a better example in the whole of human history of the Law of Unintended Consequences, we'd be interested to hear of it.  And we wish the part of the Coalition which used to call itself 'The Party of Family Values' a good night's sleep.

******

Brass band competition

On Saturday 19 February, the Great Hall complex witnessed the inaugural national competition for university brass bands, an event initiated by Lancaster University's Music Society ULMS.  Twelve bands competed.  By all accounts the day was well-organised; indeed, it was judged so successful that there is to be a repeat event, again at Lancaster, next year.  After that the plan is to hold the competition annually, rotating the venues among the competing universities. 

Brass United (a team-up of Manchester University with the Royal Northern College of Music) were the victors.  The full table of marks is available at http://www.unibrass.webs.com/results.htm.

******

Lancaster Castle

The Radio 4 programme 'Within These Walls', a repeat of the account by Lancaster's Jeffrey Richards of the interior of Lancaster Castle, was broadcast at 11.00 pm on Monday 21 February.  The programme was recorded in 2003, long before the decision to close the prison, so it is now an historic document.  It can be accessed until 28 February on BBC i-player: the link is http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0076cb2. (See also Letters for another comment on the future of the Castle.)

*****************************************************

PENSIONS: STRIKE ACTION INEVITABLE?

UCU members are now receiving their ballot papers on whether they wish to undertake industrial action in protest at proposed revisions to the terms and conditions of their USS pensions. After long gestation, therefore, it seems that a crunch point may soon be reached.

As readers will be aware, prospective changes to USS pension provision were the subject of some 18 months negotiation by the Joint Negotiations Committee (JNC), comprising representatives of the employers and USS members. At the end of these negotiations, deadlock was reached, and was resolved only by the casting vote of the independent chair, Sir Andrew Cubie, who voted with the employers.

The background to the current proposals, the proposals themselves and their implications are alike complex. Indeed, they are not only complex but obscure.  So much so, that the V-C of Cambridge wrote to USS requesting further clarification and for illustrated examples to be provided so that the implications of the proposals could be meaningfully conveyed. USS declined, and referred Cambridge to the Employers' Pension Forum (EPF).  An enormous amount of fog and obscurity persists, partly because of the inherent complexity of any changes of this kind, and partly because of the very lack of information that prompted Cambridge's request for more.

The impetus for the changes came from a concern for the long-term sustainability of the scheme.  That changes are needed was not disputed by either side in the negotiations.  What was at dispute was whether the changes need be as drastic as are being proposed and the claim that the proposals shift the burden of cost and risk to employees rather than employers.  UCU has made its own proposals for revision which it believes would meet concerns for the future in a proportionate and fair way.

The headline proposal is well known: the retention of the final salary scheme for existing members and the introduction of a new CARE (Career Average Related Earning) scheme for new entrants.  Faced with this simple headline, it would be tempting for current USS members to imagine that whatever changes are being proposed, they, the current members, will not be directly affected.  This would be a grave mistake, for a number of reasons.

For one thing, as Andy Humphrey has pointed out, 'There is a school of thought which suggests that the introduction of CARE for those enrolling after March 2011 is the beginning of a process that will remove the final salary scheme altogether, and impose the CARE scheme on existing members too' (at http://www.vitae.ac.uk/researchers/111741-309811/The-USS-pensions-consultation---why-it-matters-to-researchers.html).   Indeed, this does appear to be the precedent set by numerous other pension schemes.  If these are anything to go by, they do suggest the real possibility of a two-tier scheme as a transitionary arrangement preparatory to a universal USS CARE scheme.  Humphrey correctly goes on to observe that 'There is no evidence to suggest that this is being considered at present.'  But this falls far short of a guarantee and the precedents set by other schemes are far from reassuring.

But more seriously and less speculatively, the terms of even the continuing final salary scheme look set to be far worse than the current arrangements.  Quite apart from the shift in the balance of pension contributions from employer to employee, there is the reduction of protection from inflationary effects.  Not only is there a move from an RPI (Retail Price Index) to a CPI (Consumer Price Index) link (the latter is, of course, historically lower than the former), but the amount of adjustment is going to be capped.  This means that in a period of moderate or high inflation, the value of academic pensions will be considerably eroded.  And this erosion would exacerbate the already decreased value of pensions due to other aspects of the reform.  So this looks set to be detrimental and (depending on inflation levels) potentially seriously detrimental even to those remaining in final salary schemes.

These are complex issues and a subtext article cannot possibly do justice to them.  We have, however, discovered an invaluable article written by Susan Cooper, a Physicist at Oxford and Stephen Cowley, a mathematician at Cambridge.  It was originally published in the 'Oxford Magazine'.  Although they are UCU members, they have not written in a UCU capacity but as 'individuals trying to evaluate the proposals objectively.'  Their analysis is detailed, thorough, clear and apparently fair.  They do not unquestioningly defend the status quo, and they are even open to the possibility of some form of CARE arrangement.  But they do provide illustrative calculations of the implications of what is currently being proposed of the kind not delivered by USS.  Their calculations go to show just how much is potentially at stake, and some of them are truly alarming.

The article is here:

http://damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/sjc1/Pensions/Cooper-Cowley.pdf

A reply from Peter Thompson, on behalf of the employers is here:

http://damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/sjc1/OM/OM-306-Thompson.pdf

And a further article by Susan Cooper is here:

http://www.physics.ox.ac.uk/users/scooper/USS/USS-Sustainability.pdf

Recent modifications made by the USS Trustee Board in light of the recent USS 'consultation' period went to the Joint Negotiation Committee on 1st February, but the meeting was adjourned with their deliberations incomplete.  Even if accepted, the modifications are minor and certainly not sufficient to allay the many and diverse fears that have been raised.

The deadline for voting in the UCU members' ballot is 2nd March.

********************************************************

GETTING DOWN WITH THE KIDS IN THE CATERING DEPT

The new(ish) Cafe Twenty ten opposite the Nuffield is, let's be clear, a good thing. The food is ok, and it's light and airy. True, it often seems understaffed, it's a shame about the ever-present TV screens pumping out bland MTV (suggestion to managers; go sit in the place for a while, see if anyone is actually watching the screens), and, as so often with catering areas at Lancaster, it seems set up in such a way as to ignore the basic principles of catering ergonomics. But, on balance, we welcome it.

In particular, we welcome the opportunity for innocent fun afforded by its triptych marketing slogans, which appear to be designed to help people who have never visited a cafe before. Patrons of the private dining-room bit are exhorted to 'Sip. Chat. Read.' This is presumably aimed at us older folk, as the younger patrons next door are instructed to 'Talk. Laugh. Chill.'  (It's a shame that no-one under the age of 30 has used the word 'chill' in this sense for nearly a decade.  But, hey.)  Similarly, the salad bar suggests that we might like to 'Browse. Pick. Taste'. As opposed presumably to 'Laugh. Point. Go elsewhere'.

So, subtext competition time.  How might this type of slogan be adapted for other parts of the University?  'Phone. Shout. Snooze' for the Library? 'Eat. Sit. Slump' for the Learning Zone? 'Obfuscate. Equivocate. Privatise' for University management? You tell us.

*****************************************************

BEHIND THE YELLOW DOOR

Unidentified student in the Learning Zone, week 5: 'It's bad enough that it's pretty easy to tell a student house anyhow, but now they are making it even easier by painting the doors yellow.  Why don't they just put a big sign up too while they're about it, saying 'Students live here, out all day at lectures, please help yourselves to ipods, laptops etc.'  It's a fair point (and one also made by visitors to Lancaster who used to live in other cities with large student populations).

*****************************************************

MANAGEMENT-UNION RELATIONS II

We reported in the last issue on the new found amity between university managers and LUSU officers and the way in which they recently appeared to be 'singing from the same hymn sheet', particularly at the Court meeting and in its aftermath. It has been pointed out to us, however, that this was misleading. While it is true of the LUSU President and some other LUSU officers, it by no means true of all of them. The Court meeting revealed that LUSU officers are themselves divided on the most appropriate strategy and way forward for LUSU. Indeed, officers actually spoke against each other in the debate on the motion proposing the setting up of a Working Group to examine the implications of the new fees regime. Some of the officers appear to have serious misgivings about the strategy being pursued by the LUSU President, Robbie Pickles, and they are questioning whether the new strategy of harmonious co-operation will turn out to be beneficial and in the best interests of students in the long run.

*****************************************************

STYLE COUNSEL

Cary Cooper, professor of organisational psychology at Lancaster University Management School and one-man 'impact' factory, is apparently now an authority in work-wear. In an interview for the BBC on the trend towards more relaxed dress codes at work, Professor Cooper applauds this development, arguing that the shift from suits and ties towards smart casual makes the work environment less stressful and might even aid productivity.  He singles out the tie for particular scorn. 'What is the point of a tie? It's the weirdest thing. If someone from Mars went into an office the first question they'd ask is 'what's that thing round your neck?"' (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-12418046).

subtext was deeply impressed by Professor Cooper's apparently endless capacity for brand extension, and decided to see what further information we could find on the Robertson Cooper Ltd intranet. So, in collaboration with Wikileaks, we present below some exclusive extracts from Cary's fashion tips for university employees for Spring 2011.

Male lecturers

'If your uni's ever going to win best-in-show in the league tables we need you to have cred with the kids, so let's get to it.  First, the shoes: plimsolls at all times, preferably the Chinese slipper type - lace-ups or elasticated school PE pumps are definitely out. Try folding the backs down: this will help you achieve the self-consciously nonchalant sashay which MUST be mastered. Then, low slung camel chinos with immaculate turn ups revealing bare ankles, especially in the snow. Hair must defy gravity, cockatoo-style. If you don't sport a quiff that would make Morrissey proud with a close shave at the sides you may as well be bald. A single hoop earring adds grunge and shows you've suffered for your look.  Finish off with big, BIG glasses - a must on any facebook-profile-picture-ready face. No need for visual impairment.  Must have thick NHS frames. Think Jarvis Cocker. Bonus points for tortoiseshell.'

Female lecturers

'Artfully dishevelled, jumble-sale chic is where it's at (but don't actually go to a jumble sale - dur! - brand new, spare no expense).  Bad combinations are good - for example, high-waisted floral mini-culottes over thick woolly tights teamed with a denim shirt tied all yee-ha at the waist and the obligatory baggy cardy (think M&S pre-Per Una). Hair: painstakingly hedge-backwards-ed, looking like you just rolled out of bed (should only take an hour or two to achieve).  A nude colour palette is the mood of the moment, so make up should be neutral, except the blusher - trowel it on! Shoes: brogues or loafers.'

Security staff

'This is your moment and you've got to step-to, dress-wise.  With students getting uppity, remember that this year 'kettle' doesn't mean a cosy cup of tea with someone missing their mum, but a chance to strut your stuff.  And when every student's making like a pap with their mobile phone 24/7, and uploading it onto Facey-B on the hoof, you've got to look hard but cool at all times.  The Brit Awards were a game changer for security-wear, with both Take That and Plan B taking 'students vs. riot police' chic back off the streets onto the catwalk where it belongs.  And in that contest, jump the right way - favour Take That's shields (brushed aluminium and logos, the biz) over Plan B's (clear Perspex, yawn) every time.'

We've also searched the website of Robertson Cooper Ltd to find its exobiology section, to find out how Professor Cooper pronounces on the thoughts of extraterrestrials with such confidence.  So far, no Area 51.

*****************************************************

LIVE AT LICA: MANCHESTER CAMERATA

At their Great Hall concert on 10 February, Manchester Camerata Ensemble were led by their new and remarkably young leader, Giovanni Guzzo, aged only 24.

The concert began with another example of precocity: Britten's one-movement Phantasy Quartet for oboe and string trio, composed in 1932 for a composition competition during Britten's final year as a student at the Royal College of Music.  Despite its early date, the composer's authentic voice was already clearly recognisable.  The piece was so successful at the time that, as well as winning the prize, it was broadcast by the BBC less than a year later.

The rest of the first half of the concert was filled by two pieces from the classical era: Schubert's string trio movement D471, and Mozart's oboe quartet K370.  The players captured the wit of both composers with great skill.

After the interval the ensemble was expanded to six string players for a performance of Schoenberg's Verklärte Nacht, or Transfigured Night.  A work of extreme romanticism, this piece was inspired by a poem of the same name by Richard Dehmel, which tells of a couple walking through a wood in the moonlight.  The woman confesses that she is carrying the child of another man - but her partner replies that their love will make the child their own.  Schoenberg created a half-hour piece of programme music, in sections that correspond to the five verses of the poem.  His skill in drawing from the limited forces of two violins, two violas and two cellos an almost orchestral sound has to be matched by virtuosic capacities in performance  -  and the six players of the Ensemble achieved this with complete commitment.  If they can sustain this standard of performance with their new leader, Manchester Camerata will be very well worth following.

***************************************************

LETTERS

Research lead times

Dear subtext

It's not just Humanities academics who need a long lead time to produce their results. Here in Physics it can take years, or even decades, to design and build an experiment, and then several more to collect the data before we start to produce papers. A far longer time scale than that which the bean counters' minds are able to comprehend.

Alex Finch, Physics Department

******

Lancaster Castle

Dear subtext

I'd like to thank subtext for the fascinating description of Lancaster Castle (subtext 70). However, it sounds, from what you wrote, that the castle has an uncertain future, and that this will be difficult for the council to resolve.

During the two to three years during which it seems likely not to be redeveloped, could the castle be turned into student accommodation for the University? This might seem an outlandish idea, and obviously this wouldn't be for every student, but maybe those with a more unconventional sort of character might absolutely love to say that they had lived at a medieval castle during their time at the University.

The core reason why this could make sense is the news that the prison may cost £600/day to heat even if it's empty. If 200 students paid something rather less than the standard price for student rooms - they would be getting converted cells, after all - only £20/week of that would cover the heating bill, so the heating problem for the council is dealt with, and students might get cheaper rooms right in the middle of the city.

The amount of conversion necessary is unclear apart from changing the locks on the room doors, new furniture, and repainting the living areas - perhaps students from the Art Department could be given a lot of paint, and a remit to make the place stylish and brighter. Some might think the castle too grim for students, but a few years ago I used to know students who lived in a wide range of quite unpleasant houses in town; I can't imagine that the castle could be as bad.

As the rooms face inwards, if the students were a bit noisy, the people outside the castle wouldn't hear them. However, the planned skeletal staff for the building (which is a good name for the people looking after a spooky old castle) could act as porters, and could remind students leaving and entering that outside is a conservation area. If students had parties in the castle that were always ticketed, and the main entrance had reliable people on the door, the parties would be unlikely to have gate- or portcullis-crashers.

People at the University are always talking about making the student experience excellent, but shouldn't it be remarkable and extraordinary too?

Michael Cowie

****************************************************

The editorial collective of subtext currently consists (in alphabetical order) of: Rachel Cooper (PPR), George Green, Gavin Hyman, David Smith, Bronislaw Szerszynski and Martin Widden.

Home | Archive | Subscribe | Editors | Contact