subtext

Home
Archive
Subscribe
Editors
Contact

 

 

 

 

 

subtext

issue 80

3rd November 2011

*****************************************************

'Truth: lies open to all'

*****************************************************

Every fortnight during term-time.

All editorial correspondence to: subtext-editors [at] lancaster.ac.uk.

Please delete as soon as possible after receipt. Back issues and subscription details can be found at http://www.lancs.ac.uk/subtext.

The editors welcome letters, comments, suggestions and opinions from readers. subtext reserves the right to edit submissions.

subtext does not publish material that is submitted anonymously, but is willing to consider without obligation requests for publication with the name withheld.

For tips to prevent subtext from getting swept up into your 'junk email folder', see http://www.lancs.ac.uk/subtext/dejunk/.

If you're viewing this using Outlook, the formatting might look better if you click on the message at the top saying 'Extra line breaks in this message were removed', and select 'Restore line breaks'.

CONTENTS: editorial, shaping the future, V-C interview, 2012 concert series, Lancaster mobile app, more teaching, Cambridge election, buildings, floods

*****************************************************

EDITORIAL

As William Goldman, the writer of 'Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid', was wont to say, 'Nobody knows anything.' He was talking about Hollywood, but it's true of almost every sphere of life. (Anyone who thinks that isn't the case hasn't been keeping up with the banking crisis or the euro-zone meltdown, let alone recent weather forecasts.) So, making definitive pronouncements about the future of Higher Education, particularly in the light of changing government policy, and most especially at Lancaster, with a new VC arriving and plans afoot to forge links with Liverpool, would be foolish indeed. So here goes.

Some figures. Undergraduate applications are down around 10% across the sector for the next academic year. This trend appears to be hitting universities in the lower half of the league table hardest. (And, of course, some subjects much harder than others.) It does not seem to be affecting Lancaster much at all; in fact, in a spirit of 'to those who have, shall be given', it appears that in the current climate applicants are seeking the security of a university which will deliver the degree they seek, and that means Top Ten. Which, as we are often reminded, means us; up from tenth last year to seventh this year in the Guardian. But not, let us be clear, Liverpool, who were down from 39th to 49th. We have often counselled against reliance on league tables, and Liverpool is, no doubt, an excellent university. There's no doubting also that there are synergies (for which can usually be read 'economies and/or redundancies') that can be achieved when two institutions come closer. Now, put that thought beside recent pronouncements by certain University big-hitters about reducing University House to a couple of part-time secretaries and a filing cabinet by devolving most functions down to Faculty level, and we might start to think that we are seeing the way that the tide is flowing. At the least, the cost-benefit analysis of hooking our star to a less successful but much larger University will bear close scrutiny.

*****************************************************

LANCASTER/LIVERPOOL GREEN PAPER

Consultation on the LULU Green Paper comes to an end this week. It is not at all clear what the next stage is. Despite the very clear position of both Council and Senate that members wanted a full appraisal of risks as well as benefits, work in that direction has apparently stalled, and there seems to be a state of indecision and muddle prevailing in the centre at present. subtext just wonders, in the light of the discussions at those two bodies and at faculty level, what's happening about responding to these very clearly articulated concerns?

*****************************************************

NEW READERS NEEDED

Shocking as it may seem, some university staff don't receive subtext. Undoubtedly some wouldn't read it in a fit, but it's very possible that a good number simply don't know of our existence. In a bid to rectify this, and particularly bearing in mind that at this time of year many new staff will have just joined the university, we asked LuText to post a note about subtext. This they kindly did, but in the small ads section, where it is possible - just possible - that some of the less punctilious amongst our colleagues may have missed it. As such, if existing readers could tell their colleagues (especially new colleagues) about subtext, we'd be very grateful. Anyone wishing to subscribe should send an email to: subtext-request@lists.lancs.ac.uk that just says: subscribe. Anyone can, of course, unsubscribe at any time.

And if they, or anyone else, ever feel like writing us a letter, we'd be happy to read it, and if it was funny or interesting or pertinent or even just plain odd we'd probably publish it.

*****************************************************

SHAPING THE FUTURE

The official history of the University, written by Marion McClintock and called 'Shaping the Future' has just been published. This updates and replaces the previous volume, 'Quest for Innovation'. We will be reviewing it properly in a future issue of subtext, but a quick preview confirms that it is beautifully produced, with many photographs of people and things of interest over the last forty-some years. Those subscribers who are already familiar with Marion's fluently perceptive prose and unrivalled knowledge of the University and who therefore wish to obtain a copy without waiting for our review may contact Marion directly or go to http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/shapinghthefuture.

*****************************************************

VC IN FAVOUR OF UNIVERSITY EDUCATION SHOCK

An interesting interview with our departing VC in 'The Australian' is worth a look. It can be viewed at

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/higher-education/opinion-analysis/paul-wellings-for-university-of-wollongong/story-e6frgcko-1226088300109

What is perhaps particularly noticeable is the paragraph which reads: '[Professor Wellings]...speaks with passion of the role of the university: the virtuous circle of teaching, research and innovation, and quotes from an article by Sydney-based journalist Elizabeth Farrelly in which she argues that "university should be seen as more than a sequel to school and prequel to work." "University is a place where students learn to think critically and flexibly," he argues.'

Subscribers may feel that, had they known earlier about the VC's passionate commitment to what some may see as a refreshingly old-fashioned view of the University as a temple of disinterested learning rather than a machine for churning out salary-men and women, they might have argued rather harder against his departure. As Joni Mitchell put it in another context, 'Don't it always seem to go / You don't know what you've got till it's gone.'

*****************************************************

A MUSIC LOVER WRITES

Review - The Opening of the 2011-12 Great Hall International Concert Series

Written in 1830, the Symphonie Fantastique of Hector Berlioz is a romantic work of startling originality.  Inspired by Berlioz's passion for the Irish actress Harriet Smithson, which she repeatedly rebuffed, the symphony's five movements contain a recurring theme representing the object of his desire (the idée fixe) around which he weaves a fantastic tale.  

Fortunately it is not essential to know the story, still less to be moved by it - the symphony can be appreciated for its musical merits and for the skill of the writing. It is not only the composition of the music that is so daring: the orchestration is also very novel, grouping instruments together in musical combinations that one would not normally hear.  We were fortunate in this concert that the conductor, Paul McCreesh, drew on his experience of period instruments with his Gabrieli Consort to introduce authentic natural trumpets and horns, together with natural-vellum timpani played with hard sticks, all of which gave the orchestral sound a special piquant flavour.  The players were the talented schoolchildren of Chetham's Symphony Orchestra.  Their individual skills were certainly of professional standard, and the very high quality of the ensemble playing achieved under the baton of Paul McCreesh attested to the work that had gone into its preparation in rehearsal.

This concert, which also included performances of Berlioz's Roman Carnival overture and the highly romantic piano concerto by Scriabin, was an excellent opener to the International Concert Series.

(PS Berlioz later married Harriet Smithson, but it didn't last.)

(PPS This week Paul McCreesh has a disc in the specialist classical chart - a recording of Berlioz's Grande Messe des Morts.)

*****************************************************

LANCASTER MOBILE APP

This year ISS is offering a free mobile app which provides a range of useful information for students, and indeed for staff.  It works on smartphones such as the iphone, and on Android-based phones; it will also work on those prehistoric WAP phones, but without the good graphics available on more state-of-the-art devices.  As well as general information like the campus map and the full bus timetable, it can tell you when the next bus is due at your stop.  You can also get personal data, including your timetable (staff as well as students), the status of your Library account, and even the status of your Finance account with the University.  You can find more information about it at http://ilancasterinfo.lancs.ac.uk.

The architecture of this software, called CampusM, was developed by a commercial firm, oMbiel (anag - geddit?) and it is already being used to provide similar app services to students at a number of UK universities.  All personal data about people's Library accounts or their situation with the Finance Office is accessed from the University's computer system, and subtext is assured that this access is subject to the same checks on security as when personal data is accessed by other means (For those who are wondering, the user enters their password into the device on initial registration. It is then stored encrypted on the device. There is no way to access another user's data from the WAP version without knowing their username and password. Or by stealing their phone - and apparently ISS have that covered too.)

The University has had to buy its licence for this software, and ISS has invested time into working with students to develop the app and the data it provides.  Was it worth it?  Well, a quick and dirty poll of a sample of students indicates that just about all who have a suitable smartphone have downloaded the iLancaster app.  According to ISS, more than 6000 students are using it, so it seems to be very popular.  A small number in the sample said they preferred paper, but it was very much a minority.  Having this app on offer helps the University to build an image as a place that is both student-friendly and modern.  (It is no surprise to learn that Marketing and External Linkages Department have been involved in the project). So long as other more traditional ways of obtaining information are maintained in parallel with such advances, there doesn't seem to be a downside - we wouldn't want to see students forced to buy a smartphone because there was no other way of finding out where their lectures were being held.

There are plans to extend the app to cover more bits of the University such as the Sports Centre.  Already it will do things that can't be done any other way, like tell a student where there are some public PCs on campus that are not in use: given the pressure on PCs this seems a very useful facility.  It will also very probably help to sell more smartphones. (Buy shares now.)

*****************************************************

TEMPORA, MORES AND ALL THAT

Further to the comments about smartphones above, subscribers may have seen an article in The Guardian on the 30th October about a primary school which provides iPads and iPods for its pupils to use, and reports an improvement in literacy skills (http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2011/oct/30/education-ipad).

This may just serve to reinforce the feeling of some educators that we live in a Brave New World, whereas others will see it as evidence of learning going to hell in a handcart.  What is true, and interesting, is that change is moving astonishingly quickly.  The gap between the experience and expectations of educators and their students is expanding all the time - an educator aged over 40 has far more in common with those who taught them than they do with their students. The problem, as many have pointed out, is that the pace of change means that there is insufficient time to reflect and assess, and that change is happening - and changes to the changes - before anyone has time to work out whether a given change is a good thing, and what it means for strategic direction. Maybe it's all good, maybe we're all doomed. We'll find out when we get there, because there isn't time to find out before that.

****************************************************

THE VALUE OF PEACEFUL PROTEST

Women gained the vote in England in 1918, partly as a result of the protests of the Women's Suffrage movement before the start of the First World War.  India gained its independence from the UK in 1947, largely owing to the protests organised by Gandhi.  The Occupy Wall Street and similar protests across most western capital cities have (at last) raised awareness of the huge disparity between the earnings of financiers and common mortals.  The right to protest is fundamental to any free society.

Very recently our local Lancaster University Students' Union (LUSU) was invited to join the anti-cuts protest in London on 9th November.  Its response is that it 'will not be supporting the anti-cuts demonstration on the 9th November in London'.  And why has it made this decision?  Because LUSU is 'concerned that the correct procedures have not been carried out to ensure the safety and security of all those that attend.' (http://lusu.co.uk/2011/11/01/statement-on-9th-november-demonstration/)

In its early days Lancaster was a radical university, where argument, debate and protest were a regular part of life for both staff and students. Not any more, it seems - at least if LUSU's response is an accurate indication of student feeling. Call us old-fashioned if you will, but the subtext collective can't help but find LUSU's attitude a bit dispiriting.

****************************************************

AN ELECTION AT CAMBRIDGE

In issue 76, we reported on the Duke of Edinburgh's retirement from the Chancellorship of Cambridge, and on the official nomination of Lord Sainsbury as his successor.  At that stage, there were no alternative candidates, although we noted that there was provision for some to appear provided that they were nominated by 50 members of Senate within 28 days after the announcement of the official nomination.  It turned out that three alternative candidates did indeed emerge, thus giving rise to the first contested election to the Chancellorship since 1847.  No doubt this happened because many felt that Lord Sainsbury was not quite in the same league as the statesmen, Nobel Prize-winning academics, former Prime Ministers, war heroes and Royal personages who had held the post in the twentieth century.  Having said that, however, the three alternative candidates were not quite in this league either.  They were: Abdul Arain (a local grocer, nominated as an explicitly anti-Sainsbury candidate), Brian Blessed (the actor, supported by a wide cross-section of Senators, especially recent graduates) and Michael Mansfield (the radical QC, supported by many academics as a protest against government policy on higher education). 

An election was thus held on Friday 14th and Saturday 15th October.  The eligible electorate was enormous as the Senate includes all MAs and PhDs of the University.  In practice, 5558 Senators actually voted, with Friday being the day on which current Cambridge academics voted; returning alumni cast their votes on the Saturday.  In fact, Cambridge had something of a party atmosphere on the Saturday, due in no small part to the glorious weather combined with the general high spirits that attend large-scale university alumni reunions.  Some (though not all) colleges hosted lunches for their returning members and the weather was such that the food and drink was consumed al fresco in the various college gardens, thus enhancing the party atmosphere further.  It was therefore with some reluctance that many left these festive settings to perform their constitutional duty and vote in person in the Senate House.  

On arrival at Senate House Yard, Senators found a long snake of black-gowned figures forming a long, orderly and good-natured queue around the four sides of the yard.  The University had undertaken to provide the necessary academic gowns, but most voters seemed to have brought their own.  Further re-unions with old friends meant that the time queuing passed remarkably quickly.  The vote was conducted according to the single transferable vote system and was done by secret ballot (a far cry from 1847, when Senators had to cast their votes publicly into one or other of two large chests - one for each candidate - in the presence of the Vice-Chancellor).  On leaving the Senate House, voters were invited to take part in an exit poll, and at this stage, hopes were being raised that Brian Blessed might indeed be able to defeat the officially-nominated Sainsbury.

Over the post-election tea and cakes in the University Combination Room, word began to spread that Mr Blessed himself was ensconced in the Anchor pub, a rumour that turned out to be well-founded.  On entering the pub, Mr Blessed's unmistakable booming voice could be heard reverberating around the rafters, and in a discreet corner sat the man himself surrounded by a large crowd of nominators and other supporters.  No doubt, he was more subdued the next day, however, when the result was posted on the notice board of the Senate House.  Lord Sainsbury was declared elected having garnered 2893 votes.  Blessed came second with 1389, Mansfield attained 964 and Arain 312. 

As we reflect on these events, perhaps the most salutary observation is the fact that the election took place at all.  This was in marked contrast to what happened here in Lancaster when Princess Alexandra retired from the Chancellorship in 2004.  On that occasion, a single candidate was presented to Court for a rubber-stamp appointment.  No opportunities were given for the emergence of alternative candidates, and thus the possibility of an election did not even arise. It is to the credit of Cambridge that the appointment of its Chancellor is one in which most graduate members of the University may, in principle, participate.  In its commitment to democratic processes, it sets a standard that other universities ought to seek to emulate.  Even allowing for those disappointed at the result, the fact that an election was taking place at all gave rise to a feeling of goodwill among alumni toward the University rather than of bitterness.  A second reflection concerns the specific candidate who was in fact elected.  There can be little doubt that many of those who voted against Sainsbury did so because they thought it unbecoming of the University to nominate a man whose chief qualification appeared to be his status as a rich and generous University benefactor (he has already donated £127 million to the University over the last decade).  The Chancellor is the ceremonial head of the University and, as such, has traditionally be seen as a unifying figure who embodies the principles, values and aspirations of the university and its members.  The nomination and subsequent election of Sainsbury does appear to signal a shift in this conception.  It would be regrettable indeed if the appointment of university Chancellors were to become merely a matter of 'locating the nearest rich man and squeezing him until the pips squeak'. 

*****************************************************

BUILDINGS OFFICE LOSING THE PLOT?

The campus has seen a large programme of building works over the past decade: initially demolition of low-grade buildings, then construction of new ones, and now upgrading of those that are being retained.  During the earlier part of this programme most of us were able to carry on with teaching, learning and researching without too much disturbance; but recently doubts have been expressed in some quarters as to whether the Facilities office is according enough priority to the minimising of disturbance to the University's business.

A few weeks ago a senior colleague wrote to the Director of Facilities to question the planning of building projects and whether enough is being done to minimise this disruption.  The letter raised the cases of the Underpass, still closed after more than a year and likely to remain closed, we are told, until March 2012; inadequate drainage in Alexandra Square, so that parts of it flood during rain; and poor communication by Facilities about progress with jobs. The writer suggested, very politely, that more thought and consideration be given to the needs and activities of the members of the University whom the Facilities Office exists to serve; and that, as part of this, efforts be made to plan jobs intelligently, in such a manner as to minimise disruption both in time and space.  No reply has been received to this letter, a lack of basic courtesy that makes the writer's point rather effectively.

The flow of money to finance all this building work over recent years has clearly been very substantial and virtually continuous  -  subtext is wondering if this could be leading to a degree of hubris at the top of Facilities. Is this office beginning to lose sight of the purposes of the University?

*****************************************************

QUIET HERE, INNIT?

A propos of which, visitors at Open Days sometimes comment on what a quiet campus Lancaster is. That isn't always the experience of everyone working here. Take this Wednesday as an example. Working in County, lawn mowing starts outside office window.  Decamp to Cafe 2010, where staff are hurling plates and metal things into buckets while builders shout and do competitive drilling. Go to Bowland North to teach, where computer in teaching room hums constantly and some lunatic plays the theme to Cagney and Lacey repeatedly at high volume in a room nearby. (Not making this up.) Retreat to Learning Zone, which seems to have become the Laughing and Shouting-at-the-top-of-your-voice Zone. Go to Square, which vibrates with low hum from underneath, presumably from work in the Underpass. Head for Furness...you get the picture. Anyone know of any remaining quiet places on campus one might retreat to?

*****************************************************

FLOODS

Talk of floods in the Square brings to mind the day about eight years ago when there was a cloudburst in the Easter holiday. Janet Clements, the then Principal of Furness College, remembers coming out of the front of the College and looking up at the Square, to be greeted by the sight of a two-foot high wave coming down the Spine straight at her. It was too late to do anything, so she stood there while the flood swirled around and past her feet. She swears that, as she stood looking at the ruined new carpet in the foyer, the Porter splashed over to her and pointed at a man standing on the dry side of the quad. 'When you've a minute,' the Porter said, 'that man over there would like a word. He's from the Submariners' Conference.'

*****************************************************

The editorial collective of subtext currently consists (in alphabetical order) of: Rachel Cooper (PPR), George Green, Gavin Hyman, David Smith, Bronislaw Szerszynski and Martin Widden.

Home | Archive | Subscribe | Editors | Contact