Home page for accesible maths 2 Sequences

Style control - access keys in brackets

Font (2 3) - + Letter spacing (4 5) - + Word spacing (6 7) - + Line spacing (8 9) - +

2.4 Bounded and unbounded sequences

Proposition 2.4.1

Let {xn}n=1∞ be a bounded sequence and {yn}n=1∞ be a sequence converging to zero. Then the sequence {xn⁢yn}n=1∞ is converging to the zero as well.

Proof:  We need to prove that for any ε>0 there exists N>0 such that if n≥N then |xn⁢yn|≤ε. There exists a number M>0 such that for all n≥1, |xn|≤M. Also, there exists some N≥0 such that if n≥N, then |yn|≤εM. That is, if n≥N, then |xn⁢yn|≤ε. □

Question 2.4.1

Calculate the limit of the sequence {(1-1(1+1n2))⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢(n)}n=1∞.

Solution: By the Quotient Rule, the Product Rule, the Subtraction Rule and the Sum Rule limn→∞⁡1-1(1+1n2)=0.. Also, the sequence {s⁢i⁢n⁢(n)}n=1∞ is clearly bounded. Hence by Proposition 2.4, limn→∞⁡(1-1(1+1n2))⁢s⁢i⁢n⁢(n)=0.

We call ALL sequences that are not bounded unbounded sequences.

Example 2.4.1

{n9}n=1∞ is an unbounded sequence. 0,1,0,2,0,3,0,4,…. is also an unbounded sequence.

The most important unbounded sequences are those sequences that are tending to infinity.

Definition 2.4.1 (Plain English Definition)

A sequence of positive real numbers
{xn}n=1∞ are tending to infinity if after a while they are becoming really large.

Definition 2.4.2 (More Mathematical Definition)

A sequence of positive real numbers {xn}n=1∞ is tending to infinity if for any K>0, there exists some N>0 such that if n≥N then xn>K.

Question 2.4.2

Negate the statement: {xn}n=1∞ is tending to infinity.

Solution: It is not true that some statement holds for ALL K>0. Hence, there exists some K>0 for which the statement does not hold. The statement for this K is: There exists some N>0 so that if n≥N then xn>K. So, we need to negate this statement. It is not true that there exists some N>0 such that some statement is true. Hence for ALL N>0 there is some n≠N for which the statement does not hold. That is, there exists some n≥N such that xn≤K. So, the negation of tending to infinity is: There exists some K such that for every N there exists some n≥N such that xn≤K. In other words: {xn}n=1∞ has a bounded subsequence.

Proposition 2.4.2

A sequence of positive real numbers {xn}n=1∞ tends to infinity if and only if {1xn}n=1∞ tends to zero.

Proof:  This is easy enough to be left for the reader. □

Proposition 2.4.3

If {xn}n=1∞ and {yn}n=1∞ are both tending to infinity then {xn⁢yn}n=1∞, {xn+yn}n=1∞ are tending to infinity.

Proof:  This is even easier than the previous one.

Example 2.4.2

The following sequences are tending to infinity:

  • •

    {n10}n=1∞

  • •

    {l⁢o⁢g⁢(n)}n=1∞

  • •

    {2n}n=1∞

  • •

    {n!}n=1∞

  • •

    If {f⁢(n)}n=1∞ (see the notation, it is completely OK) tends to infinity having only integer values and {xn}n=1∞ tends to infinity, then {xf⁢(n)}n=1∞ tends to infinity as well.

Question 2.4.3

Show that if the sequence {xn}n=1∞ tends to infinity, then the sequence {xn}n=1∞ still tends to infinity. (we can write xn→∞, but it is not a good idea to write limn→∞⁡xn=∞.)

Solution: For every K>0 there exists some N such that if n≥N then xn≥K2. Hence if n≥N then xn≥K, proving that {xn}n=1∞ tends to infinity.

Question 2.4.4

Let {xn}n=1∞ be a sequence of positive numbers tending to infinity. Let {yn}n=1∞ be a sequence of positive numbers tending to C>0. Then xn⁢yn→∞.

Solution: Fix K>0 and let N>0 be such a number that if n≥N then xn>2⁢KC, also yn≥C2. Then if n≥N xn⁢yn>K. Hence xn⁢yn→∞. □

Definition 2.4.3

Suppose that the sequences of positive numbers {xn}n=1∞ and {yn}n=1∞ tend to infinity. Then we say that {xn}n=1∞ beats {yn}n=1∞ if {xnyn}n=1∞ still tends to infinity.

The following proposition is still very easy.

Proposition 2.4.4 (The Race of Sequences)

The following rules apply:

  • •

    If {xn}n=1∞ beats {yn}n=1∞ and {yn}n=1∞ beats {zn}n=1∞, then {xn}n=1∞ beats {zn}n=1∞.

  • •

    If {xn}n=1∞ tends to infinity and {yn}n=1∞ beats {zn}n=1∞, then {xn+yn}n=1∞ beats {zn}n=1∞.

  • •

    If {xn}n=1∞ tends to infinity then for any k>0, {xnk}n=1∞ beats {xn}n=1∞ consequently, {xn}n=1∞ beats {(xn)1/k}n=1∞.

Proposition 2.4.5

For every k>0 and ε>0, {(1+ε)n}n=1∞ beats {nk}n=1∞ but {n!}n=1∞ beats {Kn}n=1∞ for every single K>0.

Proof:  First recall that binomial formula:

(1+ε)n=∑k=0n(nk)⁢εk.

Since all the terms are positive, for any 0≤k≤n, (1+ε)n≥(nk)⁢εk.

Lemma 2.4.1

(nk+1)nk→∞.

Proof:

(nk+1)nk=n⁢(n-1)⁢(n-2)⁢…⁢(n-k)k!⁢nk=1k!⁢1⋅n-1n⋅n-2n⋅n-k+1n⋅(n-k).

Thus the lemma follows from Question 2.4.4 (and our usual quotient and sum rules). Consequently, (1+ε)nnk→∞. □

Now let us prove that n! beats Kn for any K>0.

n!=1⋅2⁢…⁢n>([n3]+1)⋅([n3]+2)⁢…⁢n>(n3)n/2=(n3)n,

where [] denotes the integer part function. So for large enough n, n!>Kn. □

Question 2.4.5

Is there a sequence that beats n! and (n!)! and ((n!)!)! and so…?

Solution: For any i≥1, let x¯i={xni}n=1∞ be a sequence tending to infinity. Then there exists a sequence y¯={yn}n=1∞ that beats all of them. We define yn as the maximum of the numbers {xn1,xn2,…,xnn} times n. Clearly, the sequence {yn}n=1∞ will beat any x¯i since if i≤n then yn≥xni⁢n. □