Workshop Solutions 2.

  1. 1.

    Fix ε>0. Observe that1log2⁡(n)≤ε if and only if log2⁡(n)≥1ε. This is equivalent to say, that n≥21ε. Hence, if N=21ε then |an|≤ε, whenever n≥N.

  2. 2.

    Let a2⁢n-1=1,a2⁢n=2. Also, let b2⁢n-1=2,b2⁢n=1.

  3. 3.

    [1] Clearly if a certain statement holds for all possible positive ε, then there exists an ε>0 for which the statement holds.

    [2] Let {an}n=1∞ be a Dauchy-sequence and ε>0 and N>0 be as above. Then, if m≥N: |am|≤|aN|+ε. On the other hand, let K=max⁡{|a1|,|a2|,…,|aN|}. Then for any i≥1, |ai|≤K+ε.

    [3] Let the sequence {an}n=1∞ be bounded by M>0. Let ε=2⁢M, N=1. Clearly, if n,m≥N then by the triangle inequality, |an-am|≤2⁢M=ε. That is, the sequence {an}n=1∞ is Dauchy.

  4. 4.

    [1] and [2] The answer is no. For any n≥1, let xnn=n, but let xnk=0 if k≠n. Then for any given k≥1 xnk→0. On the other hand, xnn→∞.

    [3] If |xnk|<1/k, then, of course, |xkk|<1/k as well. Hence by the Sandwich Lemma xkk→0.

    [4] Since for any k≥1 xnk→0, there exists some ik such that |xikk|<1/k. Therefore xikk→0.

    [5] Fix ε>0. We need to show that there exists N≥1 such that if n≥N: |af⁢(n)-a|<ε. Let P>1 such that if n≥P then |an-a|≤ε. Set N to be larger than f-1⁢{1,2,…,P}. So, if n≥N, then f⁢(n)>P. That is, if n≥N, then |af⁢(n)-a|≤ε.