HVP home page

"" Introduction
"" Research
areas index
"" Projects index
"" Newsletters & findings
"" Publications
"" External links

 

project details

Income Dynamics and Health Inequalities: An Analysis of Cohort and Panel Data
Award No. L128251013

Contact:
Ms. Michaela Benzeval
Department of Geography
Queen Mary and Westfield College
Mile End Road
London E1 4NS
Tel: +44 (0)207 8825439
Fax: +44 (0)207 9816276
Click to email

Principal Researchers:
Ms. Michaela Benzeval
Professor Ken Judge
Professor Costas Meghir
Ms. Jayne Taylor


Duration of Research:
April 1997 - July 1999

Research areas: Childhood; Lifecourse influences; Policy influences
Project Plan Project Summary

Background return to top
It is a truism that poverty is bad for health. Relative as well as absolute forms of poverty are associated with adverse health outcomes. Yet the precise links between financial circumstances and health are not well understood. In part, this is because most analyses of income and health are based on data collected at a single point in time. What is actually required is information that monitors changes in an individual's circumstances. Although some people face long periods of sustained financial hardship, a large number of others move into and out of poverty in various ways and for differing periods of time. These kinds of income dynamics, as they are known, may have important implications for health outcomes. For example, are long periods of time spent living on a low income more or less damaging for health than very large but temporary reductions in income? Or, are there specific stages of the life course, like childhood, when low levels of income are particularly harmful for health prospects? The purpose of this project is to investigate these and similar questions in a British context.

Aims and Objectives
The project has three aims:

  • to develop a theoretical framework that can account for the observed links between levels of, and changes in, income and health;
  • to investigate the effects of both short-term fluctuations in income and longer-term measures of more 'permanent' income on different dimensions of health using longitudinal datasets and appropriate econometric techniques;
  • to explore the economic and social policy implications of the relationship between income and health.

Study Design
Ideally, the data required for this project would include information on people's income and health at frequent intervals from childhood through all stages of adult life. Unfortunately, such a dataset does not exist in Britain. The most suitable of the available datasets for this project are the National Child Development Survey (NCDS) and the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS).

The NCDS, a birth cohort study that began in 1958, allows the examination of three distinct income and health relationships: parental income and the health of an individual during childhood and early adulthood; an individual's current health and their past income; and an individual's present income and health. The BHPS, which has collected panel data in 5 annual sweeps to date, permits the examination of the volatile nature of financial circumstances and their implications for health. Both of these datasets will be used to determine how, and to what extent, levels and changes in income affect different dimensions of health for individuals.

Sophisticated statistical modelling is required to explore the many possible ways that different aspects of income dynamics might affect health. One critical requirement is to adjust for the possibility that health influences income as well as income having an impact on health, at the same time as taking account of a wide range of other determinants of health. The project will employ the latest econometric techniques to investigate the complex relationship between income and health over time.

Policy Implications
The final part of the project will review the policy implications of the study and consult with the policy community. A central goal of the project will be to establish good links with, and disseminate findings to, key policy makers and practitioners. The intention is to provide detailed guidance about when, and in what ways, different kinds of policy instruments could be used to improve the health status of those people who are vulnerable to problems associated with fluctuating or inadequate incomes.

Project Summary
Reducing poverty in childhood and across the lifecourse is a key objective of the government's strategy to reduce health inequalities and promote social inclusion. The aim of this project was to investigate the relationship between an individual's financial circumstances and their health over time and to consider the implications of findings for policy development.

Four sets of analyses were conducted. Firstly, analyses of the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS) were undertaken to explore the relationship between income and health over relatively short periods of time (over 6 consecutive years of the Survey). This shed light on the issue of health selection (on whether the causal pathways run from poverty to poor health or from poor health to poverty) and explored the effect of income dynamics per se on health. Secondly, the 1958 birth cohort study, the National Child Development Study (NCDS) was employed to examine the role of income in childhood for adult socio-economic and health outcomes. Thirdly, a conceptual framework was developed to explore the role of income for health inequalities within a lifecourse perspective using the BHPS and the NCDS. Again, social selection (poor health leading to poor circumstances in adulthood) was taken into account. Finally, drawing on these two sets of analyses, an assessment of policies introduced by the New Labour government in the 1997-9 period was undertaken, to review its anti-poverty strategy and to identify key areas for policy development.

Key findings

  • The study brought together for the first time evidence from two British longitudinal studies to provide a more detailed picture of the relationship between income and health over the lifecourse. It is recognised, however, that unraveling the complex temporal relationships between poverty and health presents major theoretical and methodological challenges. Measurement error and selection bias pose real challenges for researchers.
  • Analyses of 6 consecutive years of BHPS data found a significant association between adult income and health, for a range of outcome measures and controlling for health selection. Persistent poverty appears to be particularly harmful for health, with a stronger relationship between measures of income over time than income measured at one point in time. This suggests that it is the accumulation of poor financial circumstances which is detrimental to health.
  • Analyses of the NCDS suggest that family income plays an important role in the pathway to adult health. While family income in childhood had a direct effect on a child's health in early adulthood (age 23), its primary effect was indirect. Family income operated primarily through educational attainment. Educational qualifications, in turn, display a significant correlation with both living standards and health in adult life. Other parental influences, and particularly family composition and time invested in quality parenting, were also found to be important factors in the pathways to health in early adulthood.
  • In analyses of the NCDS, current circumstances also mattered. The detrimental effects - direct and indirect - of low family income in childhood were reinforced by the effects of low current income.
  • The results suggest that policies to reduce poverty, especially for families with children, should be an essential ingredient in any concerted effort to tackle health inequalities. However, the evidence that the health effects of childhood poverty operate through educational pathways suggests that other policy developments, particularly to promote educational opportunities, are also required.
  • The policy analysis focused on measures introduced in the first two years of the New Labour government (1997-1999) to tackle poverty. It suggests that, while an important beginning, these policies had only marginal effects. Moreover, some key groups were excluded from the government's anti-poverty strategy. In particular, single people and couples without children experienced average reductions in their real living standards across this period. The evidence from the longitudinal analyses suggests that this reduction may affect their health adversely.
return tot op
Newsletter articles: Poverty and health; Health Action Zones
Findings: Income dynamics and health inequalities: an analysis of cohort and panel data
Website links: Michaela Benzeval - Queen Mary staff page

 

 
Introduction
Research areas index
Projects index
Newsletters & findings
List of publications
External links