HVP Home Page

"" Introduction
"" Research
areas index
"" Projects index
"" Newsletters & findings
"" Publications
"" External links

 

Project details

Comparative Methods for Studying Socio-Economic Position and Health in Different Ethnic Groups
Award No. L128251007

Contact:
Professor George Davey Smith
Department of Social Medicine
University of Bristol
Canynge Hall
Whiteladies Road
Bristol BS8 2PR
Tel: +44 (0)117 9287329
Fax: +44 (0)117 9287325
Click to email

Principal Researchers:
Professor George Davey Smith
Dr. Steve Fenton
Dr. Helen Lambert
Professor Waqar Ahmad

Duration of Research:
February 1997 - February 2000

Research areas: Ethnic inequalities
Project Plan Project Summary

Background return to top
There are important differences in the health experiences of different ethnic groups. Explanations for these differentials remain partial and contested. In particular, the role of socio-economic position in accounting for differences in health within and between ethnic groups is not clearly understood. A major reason for this is the lack of meaningful measures of socio-economic position which are valid across different ethnic groups and can be used to relate health outcomes to ethnicity. The project is designed to address this gap. It is built around studies in which the views of different ethnic communities will play a central part in the development and testing of alternative measures of socio-economic position.

Aims and Objectives
The project aims to improve research methodology relating to the measurement of socio-economic differentials within and between ethnic groups. The objectives are:

  • to develop more appropriate measures of socio-economic position applicable across different ethnic groups;
  • to apply these measures to the analysis of available datasets, thus increasing the usefulness of these datasets;
  • to contribute to the formulation of policy and practice aimed at reducing socio-economic and ethnic differentials in health.

Study Design
This study is developmental in nature and uses both qualitative and quantitative methods. The research focus will be on three broadly defined ethnic groups - white, Asian and Black Caribbean - in Bristol and Leeds. The project comprises four overlapping stages. First, a review of ethnographic work into the health experiences of different ethnic groups will be undertaken, involving contact with the original researchers where possible. Second, ethnographic studies of the relationship between socio-economic position and health will be conducted in the three groups in Bristol and Leeds. Third, a survey instrument designed to measure socio-economic position and health will be developed and piloted. Finally, a quantitative survey of health and socio-economic position in a stratified sample from the three ethnic populations will be conducted.

Policy Implications
This research will contribute to debates on, and strategies for reducing, socio-economic and ethnic differentials in health status and health care. It will provide important insights into the social and cultural meanings of socio-economic status and health within and between the ethnic groups. One aim of the research will be to develop methods for increasing the usefulness of information contained in existing datasets. To ensure policy relevance, the project team will be supported by one national and two local advisory groups composed of potential research users, including representatives from the health, local authority and voluntary sectors.

Project SummaryReturn to top
It is increasingly recognised that inadequate measures of socio-economic position and ethnicity are holding back research on, and policies to address, ethnic inequalities in health. This project aimed to improve the measurement of socio-economic differentials in health between different ethnic groups. Ethnographic research in two cities in England (in Leeds and Bristol) informed 162 in-depth interviews across three ethnic groups. These interviews in turn informed the development of socio-economic indicators, which were then used in a new survey in Leeds and in the secondary analysis of existing datasets.

Key findings

  • Ethnicity is complexly related to conventional indicators of socio-economic position, and shows variations between ethnic groups. As a result, indicators based on occupation, education, housing tenure and income do not necessarily provide an accurate picture of lifetime social circumstances in minority ethnic groups (and their impact on health).
  • Loss of employment position, and therefore earnings and career prospects, often accompanied immigration. Education may therefore relate to SES differently between ethnic groups, 'purchasing' a poorer labour market position for minority groups.
  • The migration and settlement process for respondents from minority ethnic groups often exerted a downward drag on living standards. For example, the large financial burden of remittances, together with saving for housing, made heavy demands on household income. Racism experienced by migrant parents resulted in some relatively poor parents accepting lower standards of living in order to pay for their children's private education. Household income may therefore relate differently to disposable income and living standards in minority ethnic groups than in the majority ethnic group - and between new and established settlers.
  • At a given level of reporting of subjective ill-health, minority ethnic group members tended to have a greater number of limiting conditions.
  • The meaning of socio-economic indicators across ethnic groups needs to be considered in the particular studies in which they are used, as no general rules can be made regarding the comparability or non-comparability of particular measures.
Return to top

Newsletter article:
Ethnicity, socio-economic position and health;

Housing tenure, ethnicity and inequalities: towards a contextualised approach

 

 
Introduction
Research areas index
Projects index
Newsletters & findings
List of publications
External links