HVP Home Page

"" Introduction
"" Research
areas index
"" Projects index
"" Newsletters & findings
"" Publications
"" External links

 

Project details

Ethnic Variations in Health: Assessing the Role of Class, Gender and Geography
Award No. L128251019

Contact:
Dr. James Nazroo
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health
University College London
1-19 Torrington Place
London WC1E 6BT
Tel: +44 (0)207 3911705
Click to email

Principal Researcher:
Dr. James Nazroo


Duration of Research:
June 1997 - November 1999

Research areas: Ethnic inequalities; Area inequalities/influences;
Gender inequalities
Project Plan Project Summary

Background return to top
Some ethnic minority groups in Britain, including African-Caribbean and some Asian communities, are at greater risk of experiencing the disadvantaged socio-economic circumstances that are associated with poor health. Yet little is known about the impact of socio-economic disadvantage on the health of ethnic minority people. Standard indicators of socio-economic status such as occupational class and housing tenure do not operate consistently across different ethnic groups and inadequately reflect the position of some ethnic minority groups. Consequently, measures of socio-economic status that take account of the differences in the occupational, housing and spending patterns of different ethnic communities need to be designed. Beyond socio-economic status, marital and parental roles are also crucial when considering health variations among women. However, family patterns vary among ethnic groups, so gender is an important dimension to be included in an analysis of the health of ethnic minority groups.

In addition, the social disadvantage faced by ethnic minorities is likely to involve more than material circumstances. Other important dimensions include alienation and racial harassment, which may be occurring on an almost daily basis in the lives of some. It is also likely that much of the social disadvantage faced by ethnic minorities is structured by their geographical location, which differs markedly from that of the white population. Aspects of the physical and social environment may affect health by influencing attitudes, structuring social interaction, limiting access to resources and increasing exposure to hazards. On the other hand, the concentration of ethnic minority groups in particular locations may allow the development of a community with a strong ethnic identity that enhances social support, reduces the sense of alienation and protects against the direct effects of racism.

Aims and Objectives
The project has four aims:

  • to describe the extent to which different dimensions of ethnicity are related to health;
  • to explore how far the relationship between ethnicity and health is mediated by the social disadvantage faced by ethnic minority groups;
  • to assess the influence of ethnic variations in family structure on variations in health;
  • to assess the extent to which ethnic variations in health can be attributed to differences in where people live.

Study Design
The study will be based on secondary analysis of the Fourth National Survey of Ethnic Minorities. This is a fully representative survey of the main ethnic minority groups in Britain, involving interviews with 5200 people together with a comparison sample of 2800 white people. It contains extensive information on ethnicity, health, socio-economic status, racial harassment, family structure and area of residence. It can be readily linked to the 1991 Census data at Enumeration District level and above, allowing the Census to be used in the analysis of geographical effects. The data will be used to develop indices of individuals' health and of their position in the four dimensions under consideration: ethnicity, socio-economic status, gender and family structure, and geographical location. The analysis will use multivariate techniques and, to differentiate area from individual effects, multi-level modelling.

Policy Implications
Ethnic variations in health have important policy implications for the distribution of resources and the provision of services. Our current work, which shows that levels of ill-health vary markedly between and within ethnic minority groups, has already indicated that a broad targeting of resources and services on all ethnic minorities may not be the most effective and equitable solution. The proposed research will build on these earlier findings, allowing identification of groups within particular ethnic minority communities who are most at risk of poor health. These analyses will help inform the assessment of health needs and the effective targeting of resources to particular groups and geographical areas.

Project Summaryreturn to top
Tackling ethnic inequalities in health is central to the government's commitment to improving overall levels of health in the UK and to narrowing the health gap between rich and poor. However, policies to take forward this commitment are hampered by lack of data on the health experiences of ethnic minority people. The project drew on a large and nationally-representative sample which, for the first time in a UK study, enabled the identification of the social factors shaping the health of ethnic minority groups.

The research, based on the 4th National Survey of Ethnic Minorities and the 1991 census, investigated the complex relationship between ethnicity and health through analyses which took account of the potential influence of socio-economic position, gender and area.

Key findings

  • Higher rates of mortality for ischaemic heart disease among South Asian people are well established and appear to be unrelated to socio-economic position. However, indicators of socio-economic status (SES) may be inappropriate when making comparisons across ethnic groups. The 4th National Survey allowed analysis of differentials in diagnosed heart disease and reported severe chest pain using more sensitive measures of SES. The findings suggested that South Asian people do not share a uniformly greater risk of heart disease. The better off South Asian group (Indians) have rates which are similar to those found among white people, while the poorest groups (Pakistanis and Bangladeshis) have rates which are considerably higher. Socio-economic position predicts risk in each group and makes a contribution to the higher risk found for Pakistani and Bangladeshi people.
  • Other analyses confirmed that socio-economic position is an important determinant of health within minority ethnic groups. Socio-economic disadvantage makes a substantial contribution to ethnic inequalities in health.
  • Important dimensions of ethnic identity were consistent across Caribbean, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Indian and African Asian people. However, the findings suggested that ethnic identity was not related to health. Rather, there were strong independent relationships between health and experiences of racism, perceived racial discrimination and social class.
  • Disadvantages not captured by measures of socio-economic inequality, like racial harassment and discrimination, are important to the health of ethnic minority people. Findings suggest that both experiences of racial harassment and perceptions of racism have a large impact on health, and one that is independent of socio-economic position. For example, those who had been verbally harassed had a 60% greater chance of reporting fair or poor health, while those who reported racially-motivated damage to their property or physical attacks had a more than two-fold greater likelihood of reporting fair or poor health.
  • Further analysis indicated that the different ways in which racism may manifest itself (as interpersonal violence, institutional discrimination and socio-economic disadvantage) all had independent detrimental effects on health.
  • Gender combined with ethnicity and socio-economic position to shape people's health. For example, the analysis pointed to the influence of domestic responsibilities on women's health. Informal caring responsibilities emerged as a risk factor for all ethnic groups, with having four or more children an additional risk factor for ethnic minority women. Divorce and lone parenthood were risk factors for white and South Asian women (but not for Caribbean women), with their poorer economic circumstances largely explaining the negative health effect of lone parenthood.
  • Area characteristics appeared to make little contribution to ethnic differences in health. Despite the geographical concentration of ethnic minority populations in the urban areas of Greater London, West Yorkshire and the West Midlands, it was individual factors, like social class and gender, which emerged as the major influences on health.
  • The methodological contributions of the project included its development of measures of ethnic identity and of socio-economic position (based on occupation and standard of living).
return to top
Newsletter articles:
Ethnicity;

The relationship between racism, social class and health among ethnic minority groups
Findings:
Ethnic inequalities in health: social class, racism and identity
Website link: UCL National Centre for Social research

 

 
Introduction
Research areas index
Projects index
Newsletters & findings
List of publications
External links