Top Girls revisited - with politeness in mind
      Task E – Our answer
       Win’s mitigation strategy here is similar to that she used in 
        turn 11. The NP ‘no long term understandings’, although it 
        is more specific than ‘any trouble, any reason’ of turn 11 
        (and so is slightly more threatening), does not suggest who might have 
        misunderstood who (though our schematic assumptions suggest that the best 
        odds must be on Win having misunderstood a superior). The phrase is also 
        rather vague. Similar things can be said about ‘an insupportable 
        atmosphere’. In addition, ‘come to a sudden end’ also 
        fails to indicate who or what made the understanding ‘come to an 
        end’. Louise is clearly sacrificing the Gricean maxim of manner 
        in order to mitigate her positive and negative FTA.  
      In general terms it is important to notice how the Gricean maxims and 
        Politeness Theory constraints interact with one another here. It looks 
        as if they will interact with one another in many other situations too, 
        not just this conversation between Win and Louise. 
       
        
       |