[M2.19backL] [M2.19back] 19
[diagrams] fall on the projecting portions alone. Hence therefore
the constant law; that in proportion to the increased
Note in fig 3 let the height scale of the capitals the excess of c d above a a must be
of the entire capital a be ½ less, Hence, supposing at present for convenience [?] sake
diameter of shaft in b = to it that the slope of the lower headstone, and the depth
in c double of it, and always of abacus are constant, a c d d fig 1 is the proportion
subdivided into ½ p by abacus. for a large building, a c2 d3 a, for a middle sized
building, a c3, d3 a for a small building; while at 2
and 3 the same arrangement is shown supposing the {depth of}
abacus always equal to the depth of bell: It is observable
that while the flat capital a would be preposterous
in a small building, and the tall capital c preposterous
in a large; the middle capital 1 is perfectly allowable
on the smallest scale, and while raised on tall shafts in
groups, it may legitimately become a member of a large
Relations of composition. Hitherto we have supposed that the angle slope of
Capital with the line b fig 1 p 16 was constant. But evidently
superimcum- the capital is certain fair, strong or weak in the degree to which the in the extremities
bent architect in proportion to the smallness of the ba.a1; and the
ture. admissible largeness of this angle depends on the direction
Slope of of the pressures at the extremities; and therefore
line a-b altogether on the characters of the superimcumbent
architecture: when any lines of resistance fall in a
direction approaching to the vertical, on the
[Version 0.05: May 2008]