[M2.19backL] [M2.19back] 19 [diagrams] fall on the projecting portions alone. Hence therefore the constant law; that in proportion to the increased Note in fig 3 let the height scale of the capitals the excess of c d above a a must be of the entire capital a be ½ less, Hence, supposing at present for convenience[?]sake diameter of shaft in b = to it that the slope of the lower headstone, and the depth in c double of it, and always of abacus are constant, a c d d fig 1 is the proportion subdivided into ½ p by abacus. for a large building, a c2 d3 a, for a middle sized building, a c3, d3 a for a small building; while at 2 and 3 the same arrangement is shown supposing the {depth of} abacus always equal to the depth of bell: It is observable that while the flat capital a would be preposterous in a small building, and the tall capital c preposterous in a large; the middle capital 1 is perfectly allowable on the smallest scale,andwhile raised on tall shafts in groups, it may legitimately become a member of a large Relations of composition. Hitherto we have supposed that theangleslope of Capital with the line b fig 1 p 16 was constant. But evidently superimcum- the capital is certain fair, strongor weak in the degree to which thein the extremities bent architect in proportion to the smallness of the ba.a1; and the ture. admissible largeness of this angle depends on the direction Slope of of the pressures at the extremities; and therefore line a-b altogether on the characters of the superimcumbent architecture: when any lines of resistance fall in a direction approaching to the vertical, on the
[Version 0.05: May 2008]