[M2.20backL] [M2.20back] 20 [diagrams] extremities of the capital: the angle a1ab, must be small but when the lines of pressure fall vertically through to the shaft, the projecting portions of the capital become supplementary: and the angle may be comparatively large as in Greek lintel architecture fig 1 opp; or again, when the lines of resistance are sloped to the head of the shaft, the line a b, may be made parallel to their slope; fig 2 opp; and should be so, otherwise the unnecessary weight of stone is added to the capital which The capitals of the square shafts behind the statues on the is mere extra loading of the shaft: As however in tomb of San Pietro Martire have an excess of nearly general when the excess of c d over a a; is great, the the breadth of the shaft on each side in flowing lines of resistance fall nearer the extremities of the leafage: This is done partly to bring them out from capital; it follows that [symbols] the a1 a b must be behind the figures, partly it is new leafage flowing under less in proportion to this excess; and that while in a the angle of the capital in a graceful undulation flat capital of small excess such a slope as that in fig 3 adhering to the frieze like a snail turning on its back opposite i. e. under 45 is {often} perfectly admissible it It is beautiful in its way: but would be quite unfit for would be altogether preposterous in the capital of large a pure architectural work. Specific law excess fig 4 and the specific law will follow that {in} except in every capital whose {entire} excess is more thanhalfits unsymmetrical shaft diameter, the a1 ab must be less than 135, but capitals: vid when its entire excess is less than its shaft diameter, p 24 the a1 ab may conditionally be greater than 135: but never perhaps properly greater than 140 (consider the effect of the following general rule; let the width of the abacus
[Version 0.05: May 2008]