[M2.23backL] [M2.23back] 23 [diagrams] the shaft is massy and excess of capital small (p 22 5 to 8 ) the idea of expansion or arborescence can hold only in the two cases 7 and 8 and of these since both are vaulting capitals (§ ) only 7 has sympathy with the spread of the arch above, and it is evidently the strongest form for resistance of vertical pressure the capital 8 having the appearance of weakness at the point p: On the other hand, where the pressure is central in 5 and 6, and the resistance of the capital edge depends, not on the continuance though it to the shaft of the lines of resistance, but on the cohesion of the stone the thicker that stone the better, the form 5 is mean and weak: and 6 alone admirable Hence of such capitals 6 and 7 are the true forms; Now 7 is evidently a condition of 2a : and would be very wrong if it were a condition of 2 b as at 9 while 6 is also evidently less strong and less graceful where it is a condition of 3a as 1 opp than when it is a condition of 3b (2 opp.) Such being the main conditions of the profile, we must next consider the manner in which the profile is affected by the plan of the abacus and bell: Thelatterformer is in its simplest form - square - the latter at its base (in the present case) circular. And there are evidently two ways of reconsidering the upper and lower forms: as noted at p 16. By cutting away gradually, we have the great family of cushion capital: of which the rudest are for the most part, of the profile a and
[Version 0.05: May 2008]