[M2.23backL] [M2.23back] 23
[diagrams] the shaft is massy and excess of capital small (p 22 5 to 8 )
the idea of expansion or arborescence can hold only in the
two cases 7 and 8 and of these since both are vaulting
capitals (§ ) only 7 has sympathy with the spread of
the arch above, and it is evidently the strongest form
for resistance of vertical pressure the capital 8 having
the appearance of weakness at the point p: On the other
hand, where the pressure is central in 5 and 6, and the
resistance of the capital edge depends, not on the continuance
though it to the shaft of the lines of resistance,
but on the cohesion of the stone the thicker that stone
the better, the form 5 is mean and weak: and 6 alone
admirable Hence of such capitals 6 and 7 are the true
forms; Now 7 is evidently a condition of 2a : and
would be very wrong if it were a condition of 2 b as at 9
while 6 is also evidently less strong and less graceful
where it is a condition of 3a as 1 opp than when it is a
condition of 3b (2 opp.)
Such being the main conditions of the profile, we must
next consider the manner in which the profile is affected
by the plan of the abacus and bell: The latter former is in
its simplest form - square - the latter at its base (in
the present case) circular. And there are evidently two
ways of reconsidering the upper and lower forms: as noted
at p 16. By cutting away gradually, we have the great
family of cushion capital: of which the rudest are for
the most part, of the profile a and
[Version 0.05: May 2008]