[M2.56L] [M2.56] 56
[drawing] Doges Palace. Bettio’s account setting aside his assumptions
that it is Calendario’s work, is all right as far
Central niche as page 10. but then comes his curious blunder in his
should have desire to correct Cicognara. The former is indeed
steps but not wrong in saying dopo le prima sei secate; right in marking
[?] [?] [?] [?] the beginning of the sala del Scrutinio and Bettio
has missed the real place of junction in his desire to
correct Cicognara - himself concluding that the larger
column is the mark of it.
A But, if as I once fancied, there was an arcade all round
Calendario’s work, this larger column ought indeed to have
been at the angle This is a great puzzle.
Torresella. This word explained by Bettio p 23
Note by the bye, Sansovino attribution of the red and white
facade to the Foscari p 3o9 and consider the top of the
campanile worked in same way.
B. Then - see what Bettio quotes at p 27 of Sansovino which
must be spurious, for I don’t think that bas relief of
Venice is Calendario’s work at all
Next Bettio supposes that from the two great arches, there
was a grand staircase down, and at p 27, 28 he gets very
interesting, quoting mention in Sivos Chronicle of the
old palace which was knocked down in 1423, or 4. Now there
[Version 0.05: May 2008]