|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 72
No 52,m53, 54. CA’ DANDOLO
are marked at the side; and as far as my eye could tell,
I think the single stone which forms the cusp on each
side of arch, is a little altered towards the
severe curve between d and e, before it comes to the
joint, thus differing in[j] system from the 5th order
windows: In the section fig 4 I cannot be positively
certain that the roll is greater than a but
I think so: I could not reach it. I think the chamfer
is slightly ch but am not certain even of this. Note
however the flat cavetto whivh is certain and somewhat
flat dentil. This section gives true interval [internal] between
dentils on pil. head that between those on shaft head is
about 6in.
No 52. Fig 1 - 2: profile, real size, joining at x;
of the shaft head on the left of the arch fig 1 No 51.
Capitals. This shaft head is the simplest possible Lombard:
the angle leaves being mere truncations, not
ribbed or in any wise touched; and the base of the leaf
when it falls on roll, is hardly rounded; the plan
being as a A opposite, and the space a b, (root of leaf)
- 2¾ in and b-c (interval) (rounded) 5¼ Fig 3 repre-
sents the side look of the truncation; real size,
and shows distance from angle of abacus.
The entire circumference at x is 2 " 7 at y 2 " 3½
half way down shaft still 2 " 3½ ! and at base of
shaft only 2 " 4½ The real base however is concealed
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Version 0.05: May 2008]