| Unraveling networked  learning initiatives: an analytic framework
Ellen Rusman, Fleur Prinsen, Marjan Vermeulen, Aelten Institute, Open Universiteit
 Networked learning happens naturally within the social systems of which we   are all part. However, in certain circumstances individuals may want to actively   take initiative to initiate interaction with others they are not yet regularly   in exchange with. This may be the case when external influences and societal   changes require innovation of existing practices. This paper proposes a framework with relevant dimensions providing insight   into precipitated characteristics of designed as well as ‘fostered or grown'   networked learning initiatives. Networked learning initiatives are characterized   as "goal-directed, interest-, or needs based activities of a group of (at least   three) individuals that initiate interaction across the boundaries of their   regular social systems". The proposed framework is based on two existing research traditions, namely   'networked learning' and 'learning networks', comparing, integrating and   building upon knowledge from both perspectives. We uncover some interesting   differences between definitions, but also similarities in the way they describe   what ‘networked' means and how learning is conceptualized. We think it is   productive to combine both research perspectives, since they both study the   process of learning in networks extensively, albeit from different points of   view, and their combination can provide valuable insights in networked learning   initiatives. We uncover important features of networked learning initiatives,   characterize actors and connections of which they are comprised and conditions   which facilitate and support them. The resulting framework could be used both   for analytic purposes and (partly) as a design framework. In this framework it is acknowledged that not all successful networks have   the same characteristics: there is no standard ‘constellation' of people, roles,   rules, tools and artefacts, although there are indications that some network   structures work better than others. Interactions of individuals can only be   designed and fostered till a certain degree: the type of network and its   ‘growth' (e.g. in terms of the quantity of people involved, or the quality and   relevance of co-created concepts, ideas, artefacts and solutions to its   ‘inhabitants') is in the hand of the people involved. Therefore, the framework   consists of dimensions on a sliding scale. It introduces a structured and   analytic way to look at the precipitation of networked learning initiatives:   learning networks. Successive research on the application of this framework and   feedback from the networked learning community is needed to further validate   it's usability and value to both research as well as practice. KeywordsSocial learning, collaborative learning, learning network, networked learning, co-creation, collaboration,  innovation
 Full Paper - .pdf       <back   |