| Manipulating word classesNouny styles: Our Analysis of Ulysses First of all, it is important to notice that the context surrounding 
        sentence 2 is absurd. To have a quarrel at a public execution about the 
        date of birth of a saint is itself very odd, and given that the saint 
        lived a long time ago, his exact date of birth is unlikely to be known. 
        However, if the two sides are arguing over the date (the 8th or 9th of 
        March) we will assume that the contending parties each have some evidence 
        in favour of each of the dates. But then the solution proposed which ends 
        the argument is an entirely different date in March (the 17th) which is 
        the arithmetical sum of the first two, and the acceptance of this entirely 
        different date appears to have nothing to do with evidence, or logic, 
        at all.   About 35% of the words in the passage are nouns (compared with the Ellegard 
        norm of 27%). The nouns in sentence 2 are comprised almost entirely of 
        a long list of items said to have been used in the argument. These items 
        suggest not a debate but an enormous and very vicious physical brawl This 
        brawl, in turn, seems to disappear magically when Constable MacFadden 
        suggests the 17th as St Patrick's date of birth.   16 of the 29 words in sentence 2 are nouns and 13 of these 16 are involved 
        in the long list of fighting implements. They are also all plural nouns. 
        These two facts help us to infer that the fight involved a very large 
        number of people indeed. Assuming only two implements for each plural 
        and one implement per person, the absolute minimum involved in the fight 
        would appear to be 26 people!   The fact that the list of nouns is so long leads us to look at the nouns 
        in the list a bit more carefully. The list is very variable in its composition. 
        Some items (e.g. knuckledusters) are things which we can imagine being 
        involved in a street brawl. Others (e.g. cannonballs, blunderbusses) seem 
        more appropriate to warfare. Umbrellas are not prototypically weapons, 
        but we can imagine how they might be used as such if nothing better was 
        to hand. Stinkpots, however, normally occur in the context of school pranks. 
        Some of the items (scimitars, boomerangs) appear to be associated with 
        particular national/racial delegations who might be in attendance at the 
        execution. All of this adds to the bizarre sense of disorder and confusion 
        which James Joyce clearly sets out to create.    |