Other Mobilities are possible

Monika Büscher, Centre for
Mobilities Research
, Lancaster University

Other mobilities are possible. But will a systemic shock
engender systemic change?

Covid-19 (aka Coronavirus) has shut down air travel and the global economy,
and incited a mass-move online to work, meet, and socialise. When the
catastrophe is over, will some of the lessons, values, and new practices stick?
Early signs are not promising.

As the news is dominated by Covid-19, the climate, pollution, and
environmental crises seem forgotten. Indeed, mobility systems ‘naturally’ seem
deserving of billion Dollar rescue packages, even though they are causally
implicated in the death of 7 million people from air pollution per year
worldwide (WHO),
40,000 a year in the UK,
and climate change that will impoverish, displace, and kill more than 240
million people by 2050, whilst incurring $520 billion losses (Worldbank).
Might the viral mobilities of Covid-19 eclipse these other crises?

In our current media discourse they already do. The virus is feared in ways
that mobilises instant, worldwide societal and economic transformation. In
contrast, the threat of looming systemic collapse of
vital planetary systems
has inspired very little action. It is the
multi-causal system-ness of the climate, pollution, and environmental crises
that has stopped a mobilities transformation so far. That hasn’t changed.

empty city street

To change mobility systems, more than disruption is needed.

Learning new ways of living, working, and socialising locally and online is
possible and not enough. We also need deeper understanding of, and more mobilities
research on: public understanding, reasoning and sense-making practices around system-ness
and precarity, causality and responsibility, courage and creativity, social
movements and mobile publics, collective and individual capacities for
translating understanding to transformation. For more reflections from other
mobilities scholars, see the Critical
Automobility Studies Lab
.