Linguistic indicators of point of view
      Our answer for task E
      Lewis:
      The farm worker Lewis is referred to by last name only. This suggests 
        that the narrator's relationship with him is fairly distant, and that 
        he may well be below the narrator in social status. 
      Mr Luscombe:
      Mr Luscombe is referred to by title + last name, and so the narrator 
        is also distant from him. But he is above the narrator in social status. 
        He is the owner of the farm, in fact. 
      Bill:
      Bill, Mr Luscombe's son, is referred to by first name only, and indeed 
        that first name is a shortened version of the more proper 'William'.  
      This suggests that the narrator knows Bill pretty well and thinks of 
        him as a rough equal in social terms. 
      Old Sam:
      Old Sam is referred to by his first name, suggesting he is not distant 
        from the narrator in social terms, but the modifier 'old' suggests that 
        the narrator must be a lot younger than Old Sam. 
      The boy:
      The figure introduced at the end of the passage is a boy in his mid-teens, 
        his clothes unsuited, a mere harvest helper. He is the only person not 
        introduced by name. Instead, he is introduced via indefinite reference 
        and a long noun phrase, explaining who he is and suggesting pretty clearly 
        that he is the least important of the figures in the description. So, 
        it would appear that the narrator has a rather distant relation with this 
        character. 
      But this is effectively a trick. The boy, we will soon discover, is the 
        narrator himself. Hence the third person pronoun is being used to refer 
        to someone who should be referred to with the first person pronoun. The 
        narrator is thus distancing his description, and the reader, from the 
        boy. Indeed, what is apparently a 3rd-person narration will soon change 
        to 1st-person, marking a big viewpoint switch.  
      Note, also, that there is some indication for the careful reader that 
        some sort of trick is being played here. After all, (i) the unknown boy 
        is foregrounded, as he is the only one who is unknown, and (ii) he also 
        occupies a climactic position at the end of the paragraph. At the very 
        least, it would appear that this boy is going to become a major character 
        in the story, even if he isn't yet important socially. 
       
      What social position must the reader take on while this text is being 
        read? (part ii)
      Readers usually feel that, unless there is an obvious reason to do otherwise, 
        it is their task to share the viewpoint of the narrator. If we ignore 
        the reference to the unknown boy, in social terms the narrator appears 
        to be a bit younger than, and of a similar social status to, Bill, Mr 
        Luscombe's son. Hence we will tend to take on that viewpoint as we read. 
        This helps to increase the shock when, a few pages later, it is revealed 
        to us that the unknown boy is actually the narrator himself as a young 
        boy. 
        
       |