[Jan Bebbington] Our final speaker for this morning is a very long-standing collaborator of of mine Ian Thompson, and so there's, there's a few of us who are not as young as we wish we were that go back to the
very, very early days of of social environmental accounting, and the difficulty of last year is we also lost the founder to social environmental accounting, Rob Gray, in the same year, he died in the June. And so that was a very sort of tough year in any event, and it really sort of brought us all back to the, the times in the the 1990s when when we've, we first met and when we, as a group of us started collaborating together in various combinations.
And so I'm thinking Brendan O'Dwyer, who we'll hear from later on today, Carlos Larrinaga, who I know is on on the connection as well, Ian Thomson, myself and Jeffrey as well. And so we, we saw each other a lot over the years and some of the pictures in your programme... the one on the the top right hand side, was indeed from a 1997 conference when we're all just starting to get to know each other and we all look very young, and my, my most delightful PhD student just told me earlier on she was three when this was taken, so um yeah it sort of tells you that, that time, time invested it makes outcomes which is really great.
So Ian, may I invite you to come and provide some reflections from the Centre for Social and Environmental Accounting Research.
[Ian Thomson] Thanks everyone, it really is my kind of privilege, it's not this morning, it's this afternoon now isn't it, and to to pay tribute to a real star of the CSEAR network, one of whom, Dave Owen, who many of you may know, called that, was one of the 'Ant and Dec' of social environmental accounting.
And this was in no way meant to be a derogatory, but rather captured their enthusiasm, insights and passion and new ways of thinking about a topic, which was seen as a really welcome change from the grumpy older men and women who had actually kind of [inaudible] you know kind of started it off. One of the great kind of joys I found was, was actually discovering that Jeffrey was older than me having, having, having kind of existed for about 20 years thinking he was younger than me. So um so again a bit of a 'Peter Pan' in this field as well.
But, Dave, in the same conversation to me, marked him, marked him out as future intellectual leaders, of the field and of the CSEAR network. Just for a little bit balance, they've also said in the same thing, he said if academic accounting didn't work out for me I always had a career in stand-up, which was kind of quite encouraging for for you know your research from an eminent professor at the time, but I think he was wrong about me but he certainly wasn't with Jeffrey and the mystery 'Dec' (I'm going to keep, keep that person a surprise).
Jeffrey played a heroic role in building CSEAR from what was a small, tight-knit network initially focused on disrupting the kind of the mainstream academic and practice, and he moved it from that tight disruptive network into a global movement - a global movement which now has an active community of 900 scholars across every single continent that you can get. And...it's growing, it's a global movement that's now respected by the critical and the mainstream, and as we heard from practice as well. A significant kind of transition that I think many people wouldn't have thought was possible to actually to do that. It is worth pointing out that CSEAR, even though we've got all these things, we've got no money, we have no money, we get a little bit of membership, virtually everything, 99 percent of what we do is voluntary. It's effectively people choosing to act for a purpose with no ostensible reward, and sometimes derision, certainly in the early stages where it's like you're involved with CSEAR, why are you doing that?
But people persevered and in many ways as the kind of the, the convener of the council it's humbling to witness this massive collaborative effort, in what is effectively a self-organising network. And today I want to try and do justice to Jeffrey's decades of work in this regard but I won't be able to do it, to to do all, I think it would, it would, I don't know how long it would take to actually to document everything.
Now, I will not pretend that I always agreed with Jeffrey, and I know that he didn't always agree with me. How did I know that? I'm not a mind reader? No. He told me, when he didn't agree with you he told you. Not to pick a fight, not to grandstand, not to platform, because but of a kind of a, a genuine concern with the topic or the network. He cared about, he cared about genuinely and respectfully engaging in scientific conversations, as a productive dialogue not false platitudes or storming off in the huff when things don't go your own way, which we all know is a really attractive kind of thing to do, the theatrical 'Oh, I'm not staying for any more of this'.
But he kind of, I kind of learned an awful lot of, of how you do, how you can do things. He was able to separate robust scientific argument from personal relationships, and that insight was essential to building the community. Productive engagement and dialogue. Saying everything is great doesn't work, neither does disagreeing with everything there's a middle ground. Productive engagement, collaboration, partnership, respect and these are, these are things Jeffrey embodied, and things he embedded in CSEAR. It was great fun to argue with Jeffrey, it was really, really good fun he was quick, insightful, politically aware, incredibly well-read, but always had a concern about making change happen, making things better, a pragmatic concern that actually kind of didn't let perfect get in the way of better.
He understood about transition, he understood about how to, how to kind of to build things. And he's very much, his philosophy was we mustn't let our differences divide us or define us, but actually our similarities unite us. Now that's a valuable lesson to someone like me who is instinctively oppositional, it's it, it really is is my kind of thing. But it also is a lesson that it's kind of like key to building a community.
Jeffrey also opened up a Southern front, the Southern trenches in 'that London'. The home of imperialism, where the dreaded market existed. Up until that point CSEAR had largely been a little bit peripheral, marginal, Northern like in, in all its regard, pointing the finger down at them. Jeffrey lived there, he kind of embedded so much about, like I've learned so much about London around there, he became the Southern rallying point, if you like, in that, in that space, and instrumental in building the community south of the Watford Gap, with many a fun discussion about where civilisation started and stopped and and many of those kind of Jeffrey's things.
He also, along, alongside Linda Lewis he, a lot of people don't necessarily remember, when you look at Jeffrey's work, he was one of the first to seriously investigate the role of the internet and digital, he shifted us from analogue to digital. In a way he was first, first really person types to do a serious study on the impact of this, and that was his first work. Which again, I think people have said, in terms of his longer term vision and seeing where things is his ability to future.
Now, there's a, there's a... little story about, about this which I'll I'll go, and I'm sure Brendan O'Dwyer who's going to take... will remember. We, the three of us, decided we'd go to the Irish Accounting and Finance conference in Galway, largely because Brendan was from Galway, and it said it's a brilliant place to go, it'll be absolute great craic, and so we thought, okay let's go, but to be honest me and Brendan, we're a little bit worried about how Jeffrey's going to go down. I mean he definitely had, he's got the poshest English accent I've kind of...of any of my friends, right, and and he's definitively English, you know you can't really argue, you don't say, you never say oh Jeffrey where are you from? You could have, you got that sort of like right away, and and he's walking into this you know this rebel, rebel kind of like hotbed of kind of like Western...Ireland sitting there, and at the time social environmental accounting was not the traditional fare of, of the Irish Accounting and Finance Institute.
So, oh well, he's...he's a big boy, he'll do it. So anyway, so Jeffrey, kind of walked into the front, stood there and he said 'Hello, I'm Jeffrey', I can't do his accent so I won't even try, and 'I'm going to do this thing on corporate social responsibility on the internet.' Perfect pause. And he goes 'now, if you don't know what the internet is I believe it'll be coming to you soon.' [audience laughter] And exactly that, there was laughter, there was ice broken and a memorable three days emerged. But that was that kind of thing that confronting the kind of the challenge, and just to let you know CSEAR Ireland had its third conference with 176 people attending, from that very kind of small thing, and Jeffrey was invited back more than once to go and talk, talk to them there.
He was a master of the art of being quietly critical, making points powerful insights, deeply informed by theory but without appearing to be critical, or needing to resort to political polemics or pantomimes. Preaching to the converted was not his style, he didn't see the point, he could polemicise with the best of them but in private. He was not a natural revolutionary but he changed things, he built bridges. In CSEAR he was very much the rebuilder of bridges that had been broken as part of the creative destruction process that's often necessary for any kind of radical transformation. And it's a much harder job than it sounds, but it's really important, and I know for many of us involved there that was not, that was not our strength. And to be honest I still love a little bit of creative destruction, you kind of get in there, you [inaudible]. The problem with creative destruction as a consequence you're left with broken pieces that need to be put back together, and you need people to put them back together, and Jeffrey instinctively moved to that space. Nobody said can you do that, he knew that was that was actually the part to do it, he recognised the need and got on with it. Much of it was backstage out of the pub...out of the public limelight, even reaching out to existing allies inside and outside CSEAR engaging with whoever needed reform.
He didn't see the profession or practitioners as a monolithic all-powerful enemy who slavishly worshipped at the altar of neoliberalism but he rather saw them as a conflicted complex assemblage of individuals and institutions. Many of them were experiencing the same amount of oppression that other businesses and other people were actually feeling. They were communities that were struggling to do the right thing, or didn't know what the right thing was to do, okay? He also recognised that there was some in there who were vehemently opposed to any social and environmental accounting reform. His great insight was that this last group was a minority and it was about seeking allies elsewhere and it was all too easy and had fallen into the track of, of conflating the vocal opposition to social environmental accounting reforms and neoliberal propagandists with the profession. His great gift was that these 'shock jocks' were actually a minority and to see beyond them with the people who wanted to change and you could actually work with. And his approach really contained tactics about engaging with the 'would like to do something but don't know what to do' by telling them what they could do, that's what they should do as well. And he was actually able to to create, recreate bits of CSEAR as a home if you like for people who wanted to do things where you could have, where you had also people from marginal...who were marginalised in other communities, and and to do this...his approach was highly effective and he was also acutely sensitive of culture and context.
He started from, as Americans say, where where people are at, not from the Irish, well if that's where you're going you wouldn't be starting from here. Okay? Where are we, what can we do. I remember conversations when we had...sort of like, first kind of group of people from, from China, mainland China, coming to CSEAR conferences and they were presenting papers which you know to be honest were rubbish, right, and we were going, oh look at that they're rubbish, and Jeffrey pointed out, no they're not rubbish, what they're doing is they're doing normal science properly, they've been reading the articles they've been following the kind of trends and they're being kind of like emulating and replicating. We shouldn't criticise them for doing that just because it's different. Our responsibility is to engage and to nudge and to move them forward and to make things better, not to criticise or dismiss.
He was um also the kind of CSEAR's bridge to institutional opportunity in other communities, got access to grants, identified change in regulations and standards as opportunities to influence change. And it's really hard to underestimate the time, persistence, long hard kind of job that that is, poring over rules and regulations, keeping abreast of possible interventions, reading minutes, following up meetings, responding to drafts and consultations, this is very much the unglamorous hard yards of accounting engagement. It's quite ironic being a sporting metaphor for Jeffrey, I just realised that I've done this. I remember we had a, a competition one time in a bar and we said how many players are in a rugby rugby team, football team, rugny union team and cricket, and he got one right, which is anyway...
In some ways the the ritualistic academic arena was important but he kind of thought it was too disconnected to make a difference, and I was really fortunate enough to to witness Jeffrey's skill with regard to his work on the CSEAR council, where for years he displayed his many leadership skills. Hard conversations. Coherence with vision, capacity building, intelligent negotiation and attention to detail. His work at transforming the Social and Environmental Accountability journal from an informative newsletter to a fully-fledged peer-reviewed scientific journal which still kept the essence of the original communication was testament to all these skills. Not only that, he set it up, but then he then took it on and did the work as editor. So it's all very well to say oh do this, he actually went in and he did it and he's actually kind of again not just got the, the vehicle of SEAJ but actually he's then set the tone and that kind of transformation which is now a journal, a recognised journal in its own right, and a key kind of like publication in our network.
He contributed to CSEAR as a research innovator and leader. He was a gifted researcher and social scientist whose work remains an inspiration and a blueprint for others to emulate. He was able to apply different theories and different methods intelligently, but also humbly recognise the limitation. What really got him annoyed was poorly done research, not different theories or different methods, it was like just do the job properly. He could patholog...pathologically dissect papers and I've been on the other end of that pathological dissection on a number of times, but he rarely did it in public and he actually never did it in public with early career researchers.
As well as appreciating his lively workshops and kind of paper presentations at various CSEAR conferences, his masterful plenary performances, my abiding memory was not Jeffrey in front of a microphone here, it would be when you came out for coffee he'd be sitting quietly with somebody who just presented a paper and he'd be like scribbling down wee notes, quietly, privately having having conversations with this kind of this person about how maybe you can, constructively engaging with them, nudging them towards better ways to achieve their research questions. Not his or not ours. And I think he put hours in this, in this patient endeavour, helping build the community, creating and arguably saving careers, and I'm sure many of us have benefited from this freely given advice and looking around the audience i know people who've had the benefit of those sitting in the corner, round the edges [inaudible].
Jeffrey was a powerful advocate for for social environment accounting research and CSEAR in particular, and his many roles which we've heard about today but also as an editor, council member and also kind of a reviewer in that place. There was decades of hidden community building practices which will always be in his debt. Now I don't want to paint this picture of a bureaucratic minded diplomat, nor was he always a peacemaker. When harsh words were needed and difficult decisions to be made he spoke and he acted, but not in his own interest but for the bigger picture and vision. He was delightfully mischievous...[laughs]
If you chair in a session or you were sitting there they would chair with, eventually they would be out like a one word and there'd be a ripple of laughter and you could just like...trace it back to where Jeffrey was sitting and other people were giggling. But he did provide the balance and wise counsel that was needed to grow, create and mobilise a community he worked easily alongside the ranters, the silenced and the marginalised, he constructed our capacity for impact and for that we are eternally grateful.