Information for DClinPsy applicants

Lancaster differs from many other Clinical Psychology programmes both in the way it selects candidates to interview and how it chooses those to offer places to. We have provided some background to our values and approach as it will help you understand the tasks applicants are asked to undertake.

Linked icons

Linked icons


  • How our values translate to our selection procedure

    The programme strives to ensure that we uphold the values of social justice, equality, and inclusivity at all times, including in our selection process. For this reason, our procedure is designed to actively encourage those from diverse backgrounds to apply and is focused on an individual's potential to become an outstanding clinical psychologist rather than over-emphasising existing knowledge and skills.

  • We are proactive about supporting people with disabilities

    If you need support to access our selections procedure or feel that any aspect of our process would put you at a disadvantage, we will work with you to mitigate these issues and ensure that you are given a fair opportunity to show your potential. Please contact us and we can discuss your options.

  • Why we use a shortlisting test

    Many applicants to our programme are fortunate enough to have had access to extensive education and employment. However, some individuals have not had these privileges, and may never have, but have significant potential and are well suited to the programme. As we want everyone to be assessed on a fair basis, we use a shortlisting test which examines potential rather than looking at the application form which emphasises experience. Evidence also shows that application forms are a very poor predictor of job performance. Our approach means using shortlisting processes which have substantial evidence to indicate they predict performance on both the programme and in a complex job role once qualified.

  • Why we focus on competencies, not knowledge and skills

    Our selection event looks at the competencies an individual holds, not their knowledge and skills. As we have noted, for a variety of reasons not all applicants are fortunate enough to have the same access to education and employment. We focus on the potential of the applicant to develop during training and the personal qualities which will be required to manage both the programme and the job following qualification. While some applicants are disappointed that we do not look at their specific professional experiences, to do so would undermine our commitment to social justice and potentially unfairly exclude some applicants.